PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Number7 on December 23, 2025, 07:59:06 AM
-
I'm guessing fang fang isn't pleasing eric these days and he has moved on to pre-pubescent boys now.
https://twitter.com/i/status/2002837375077208362
-
I’m more interested in how he’s getting around California law that states, clearly, that he must be a citizen of that state to run for governor.
Oh, and Swalwell makes Newscum look like a genius.
-
What Grok says about that....
Yes, Eric Swalwell is a legal resident (domicile and inhabitant) of California.He has represented California congressional districts (currently the 14th, previously the 15th) since 2013, and the U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 2) requires representatives to be "inhabitants" of their state—a requirement courts interpret flexibly for members of Congress who maintain primary ties to their home state despite time spent in Washington, D.C. Official sources, including his House website and congressional profiles, list his hometown as Livermore or Dublin, California, where he was raised, served on city council, and worked as a prosecutor in Alameda County.A recent controversy (primarily from conservative outlets like The Gateway Pundit in late 2025) alleges that Swalwell lacks a verifiable California residence, pointing to a 2022 D.C. mortgage deed declaring his Washington home as his "principal residence" (common for securing better loan terms) and claiming no owned or leased property in California. These sources argue this could disqualify him from Congress or his 2026 California gubernatorial run, citing state residency requirements.However, Swalwell has countered this by affirming his California residency in sworn affidavits (submitted to his lender) stating the D.C. home is primarily his wife's and that he remains a California resident. Mainstream reporting (e.g., CNBC) describes the allegations as politically motivated and disputed, with no official disqualification or loss of his seat. He continues to serve as California's representative, votes in California elections (implying registration there), and maintains district offices in the state.In summary, while the mortgage declaration raises questions about his primary physical home, legal residency for electoral purposes is based on intent and ties to the state—which Swalwell demonstrably maintains. There is no evidence he has been ruled non-resident by any authority.
-
Two types of laws.
Laws that are enforced against Republicans and laws ignored against democrats.
-
Two types of laws.
Laws that are enforced against Republicans and laws ignored against democrats.
They are the same laws.
-
What Grok says about that....
So his “primary” residence is California and his “principle” residence is Washington. Because his wife lives there.
Did I read that right?
Sounds like he wants to have his cake and eat it too. Typical slimy politician.
-
What Grok says about that....
Different requirement for California Governor. Sir Fartsalot uses his attorneys address as his "residence" but that doesn't cut it.
Sir Fartsalot is a carpet bagger.
-
Sounds like he wants to have his cake and eat it too. Typical slimy politician.
He's a politician, right?
I have a solution, build some Government housing, 535 units for Representatives and Senators when they are in town.
-
He's a politician, right?
I have a solution, build some Government housing, 535 units for Representatives and Senators when they are in town.
I have said that for years!