PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Mase on May 19, 2016, 03:55:22 PM
-
Security Guard arrested, for removing man from Women's rest room.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/19/security-guard-arrested-for-removing-man-from-womens-bathroom/ (http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/19/security-guard-arrested-for-removing-man-from-womens-bathroom/)
-
With all of the noise going on over this idiotic "issue" BHO cooked up, one has to wonder what is going on behind the scenes that the administration wants the public to go unnoticed.
-
With all of the noise going on over this idiotic "issue" BHO cooked up, one has to wonder what is going on behind the scenes that the administration wants the public to go unnoticed.
I think BHO most definitely WANTS this bullshit stuff to be visible. If it ain't visible, it ain't an issue that can divide us.
Ultimate transformation.
-
I think BHO most definitely WANTS this bullshit stuff to be visible. If it ain't visible, it ain't an issue that can divide us.
Ultimate transformation.
Anytime the administration is up to something that they don't want on the surface they produce an "issue" that consumes the media and public.
I believe this is yet another ploy.
-
"He told WJLA (http://wjla.com/news/crime/security-guard-arrested-for-assault-after-pushing-transgender-woman-from-womens-restroom) that he believed “the woman had no reason to put her hands on me,” adding that he was emotionally traumatized by the incident. “I’m hurt by this. It’s terrible… I’m distraught,” he said. “People should not be discriminated based on their gender identity.”
-
I think BHO most definitely WANTS this bullshit stuff to be visible. If it ain't visible, it ain't an issue that can divide us.
Ultimate transformation.
Divide?
The presumptive nominees of both parties support him.
-
The security guard is being investigated for a hate crime? This is getting out of control.
-
The security guard is being investigated for a hate crime? This is getting out of control.
Yep.
-
The security guard is being investigated for a hate crime? This is getting out of control.
Again with the Trump bashing when the thread isn't about Trump. (TDS).
-
Again with the Trump bashing when the thread isn't about Trump. (TDS).
I didn't say anything about Trump nor imply it.
-
I didn't say anything about Trump nor imply it.
Sorry. I must have replied to the wrong post. I was aiming at Jeff's post.
-
Sorry. I must have replied to the wrong post. I was aiming at Jeff's post.
Where the word "Trump" was never uttered, I note.
-
Sorry. I must have replied to the wrong post. I was aiming at Jeff's post.
Inverse TDS???
-
Where the word "Trump" was never uttered, I note.
All right then, perhaps I misunderstood.
To whom were you referring when you said the "presumptive nominees of both parties"?
We all know that Hillary supports Obama, but who was the other one you were referring to?
-
All right then, perhaps I misunderstood.
To whom were you referring when you said the "presumptive nominees of both parties"?
We all know that Hillary supports Obama, but who was the other one you were referring to?
Well, the fact that Trump has weighed in on the Trans-bathroom issue 100% in line with Obama.
It's not TDS to cite his own statements.
If his intent was to create division, then the fact that both party candidates support his position is entirely relevant to the conversation, as it shows that he has failed to create such division.
-
Well, the fact that Trump has weighed in on the Trans-bathroom issue 100% in line with Obama.
It's not TDS to cite his own statements.
If his intent was to create division, then the fact that both party candidates support his position is entirely relevant to the conversation, as it shows that he has failed to create such division.
Agreeing with someone on a topic or two or however many does not imply general support.
At one time I was one of two advisors to our CEO. I often disagreed with the other advisor and I thought this was a problem for the CEO. During one of our conversations, I apologized to the CEO for our different opinions. I'll never forget what he told me.
If you both agreed on everything, then I would only need one of you.
If you both disagreed on everything, then I wouldn't need either of you.
Fortunately, we usually agreed, but not always. When the other advisor and I disagreed, the CEO would make the final decision. About half the time he took my advice, and the other half he took the other guy's advice. (he was wrong those times ;)) Which one of us would you say that he "supported"?
-
"He told WJLA (http://wjla.com/news/crime/security-guard-arrested-for-assault-after-pushing-transgender-woman-from-womens-restroom) that he believed “the woman had no reason to put her hands on me,” adding that he was emotionally traumatized by the incident. “I’m hurt by this. It’s terrible… I’m distraught,” he said. “People should not be discriminated based on their gender identity.”
TL;DR version: I'm going to lawyer up and see how deep the pockets are...
-
TL;DR version: I'm going to lawyer up and see how deep the pockets are...
Sorry if I"m a little slow. But what is meant by "TL;DR version:"
-
Sorry if I"m a little slow. But what is meant by "TL;DR version:"
Too long; don't read. Just an abbreviated version of a long post.
-
Right on cue progressives have created another whining baby coalition.
The instant people started to get weary of the whining race hustlers, progressives appeared with the free birth control whiners.
Now it's make believe angst over whether they are an innie or an outie.
How do liberals survive even one day with so many make believe hurts and fears?