PILOT SPIN

Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: JeffDG on June 09, 2016, 07:30:31 AM

Title: Critical topic of concern
Post by: JeffDG on June 09, 2016, 07:30:31 AM
Since I've been accused of never posting Hillary stuff:


(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkhAYVZUYAEHUF9.jpg)
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: nddons on June 09, 2016, 07:58:41 AM
I'd go with the sucking device on the right.
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Bob Noel on June 09, 2016, 08:13:04 AM
The Kirby is much more useful and reliable.

(must resist joke about .....)

Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: JeffDG on June 09, 2016, 08:15:59 AM
(must resist joke about .....)
If Hillary shared more than a wardrobe with the Kirby, that Monica would never have happened?
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Mr Pou on June 09, 2016, 08:29:16 AM
The Kirby is much more useful and reliable.

And has an off switch.
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Mr Pou on June 09, 2016, 08:30:36 AM
Since I've been accused of never posting Hillary stuff:


(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkhAYVZUYAEHUF9.jpg)

I know who Bill would choose...
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: bflynn on June 09, 2016, 08:46:08 AM
And has an off switch.

Right.  You can throw it out when you're done with it, it doesn't keep getting in your face and keep running.
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on June 09, 2016, 09:26:42 AM
The $12k jacket.
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: nddons on June 09, 2016, 10:01:17 AM
The $12k jacket.
Worn in a speech discussing "income inequality."
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Jaybird180 on June 09, 2016, 10:23:29 AM
As I recall correctly, when you unzip the zipper the dirt falls out onto the floor because they didn't have bags in them.

Oh, and we had a Kirby too when I was little. ;D
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on June 09, 2016, 07:37:25 PM
As I recall correctly, when you unzip the zipper the dirt falls out onto the floor because they didn't have bags in them.

Oh, and we had a Kirby too when I was little. ;D

I sold Electrolux when I was in Tech school in the AF.  Used to love to go in a home with a Kirby.  We'd get it out to compare and turn the switch on before we plugged it in.  When we plugged it in and it started we'd quickly unplug it, jump back ans ask "does it always make that much noise"

Another was to turn it over and make a comment about it looking like a dead cow. Or turn it on and hit the bag and watch the dust fly    ;D
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Lucifer on June 09, 2016, 07:43:35 PM
Q: The difference between a Harley and a Kirby vacuum?

a: Position of the dirtbag.
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Little Joe on June 10, 2016, 04:49:33 AM
I sold Electrolux when I was in Tech school in the AF. 
.
.
.

Ooooh brother Eppy,  I don't know if I would have admitted that! :o
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Anthony on June 10, 2016, 05:39:11 AM
Worn in a speech discussing "income inequality."

Ironic isn't it?  The hypocrisy of the left knows no bounds.  It is OK for her and Bill to accept $600,000 per pop speaking fees for illegal influence.  That's "fair"?  Right?
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Lucifer on June 10, 2016, 05:43:39 AM
Ironic isn't it?  The hypocrisy of the left knows no bounds.  It is OK for her and Bill to accept $600,000 per pop speaking fees for illegal influence.  That's "fair"?  Right?

Hypocrisy?   You mean like how the press obsessed over the Trump U. lawsuit but just conveniently over looked this:  http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/02/hillary-university-bill-clinton-bagged-16-46-million-from-for-profit-college-as-state-dept-funneled-55-million-back/

 You're right, their hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: JeffDG on June 10, 2016, 05:46:23 AM
Hypocrisy?   You mean like how the press obsessed over the Trump U. lawsuit but just conveniently over looked this:  http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/02/hillary-university-bill-clinton-bagged-16-46-million-from-for-profit-college-as-state-dept-funneled-55-million-back/ (http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/02/hillary-university-bill-clinton-bagged-16-46-million-from-for-profit-college-as-state-dept-funneled-55-million-back/)

 You're right, their hypocrisy knows no bounds.
The press is obsessed with the Trump U lawsuit?


Trump is obsessed with it, and the press is simply following along.
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Little Joe on June 10, 2016, 05:57:55 AM
The press is obsessed with the Trump U lawsuit?


Trump is obsessed with it, and the press is simply following along.
Yeah, sure Jeff.  Trump initiated the law suit because he is obsessed.
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: JeffDG on June 10, 2016, 07:18:24 AM
Yeah, sure Jeff.  Trump initiated the law suit because he is obsessed.
He can't stop talking about it.
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on June 12, 2016, 10:34:57 PM
One does wonder how Armani managed to get someone to pay $12K for a potato sack with sleeves.   ???
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Number7 on June 13, 2016, 06:46:50 AM
One does wonder how Armani managed to get someone to pay $12K for a potato sack with sleeves.   ???

I think Armani got that fabric from our old sofa bed, bought in the sixties. I guess that is taking recycling to another level altogether.
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: You Only Live Twice on June 24, 2016, 07:43:36 AM
Worn in a speech discussing "income inequality."

Liberal hypocrites.

Actually that is a redundancy.
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: You Only Live Twice on June 24, 2016, 07:44:04 AM
One does wonder how Armani managed to get someone to pay $12K for a potato sack with sleeves.   ???

You think she paid for it out of her own pocket?
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Dav8or on June 24, 2016, 11:10:02 AM
You think she paid for it out of her own pocket?

Probably not. A gift from her foundation I suppose.
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Little Joe on June 27, 2016, 09:04:26 AM
Probably not. A gift from her foundation I suppose.
And I doubt it was part of the 12% administrative fees. It was probably listed as a charitable distribution.
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: JeffDG on June 27, 2016, 09:16:20 AM
And I doubt it was part of the 12% administrative fees. It was probably listed as a charitable distribution.
She and Bill were flat broke when they left the White House donchaknow?
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Bob Noel on June 27, 2016, 09:55:00 AM
She and Bill were flat broke when they left the White House donchaknow?

given her ability to magically make money while bill was governor....
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Anthony on July 01, 2016, 05:31:50 AM
given her ability to magically make money while bill was governor....

The Clintons are surprisingly corrupt even for politicians. 
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Jaybird180 on July 01, 2016, 07:11:04 AM
The Clintons are surprisingly corrupt even for politicians.

Is that anything like a double negative?  Corrupt * Politician = an honest broker
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Bob Noel on July 01, 2016, 07:43:07 AM
Is that anything like a double negative?  Corrupt * Politician = an honest broker

nope - to the contrary... it's redundant.

Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Jaybird180 on July 01, 2016, 08:03:30 AM
I should have clarified that double negatives violate the rules of grammar and shall get thee smitten with 50,000 volts of a lighting bolt from the heavens.

Now, does that make it clearer?
 ;D
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Bob Noel on July 01, 2016, 08:13:39 AM
I should have clarified that double negatives violate the rules of grammar and shall get thee smitten with 50,000 volts of a lighting bolt from the heavens.

Now, does that make it clearer?
 ;D

No, it doesn't.

:-)
Title: Re: Critical topic of concern
Post by: Mase on July 01, 2016, 10:43:15 AM
I should have clarified that double negatives violate the rules of grammar and shall get thee smitten with 50,000 volts of a lighting bolt from the heavens.

Now, does that make it clearer?
 ;D

LOL.

A sense of humor is a wonderful thing.