PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Lucifer on August 11, 2020, 01:38:44 PM
-
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/hold-vp-pick-kamala-harris
-
This will piss off the radical side of the DNC. They wanted a far left communist radical, and now they have a former prosecutor.
And although a "woman of color", she is not an African American.
Trump campaign can start building ads of her excoriating Biden on the debate stage. Should be fun.
-
Yeah, but has she accepted? I thought Willie told her not too. Hasn't she taken order from Willie before. :)
-
Not surprised. She's an embarrassment that she's even in politics.
-
Yeah, but has she accepted? I thought Willie told her not too. Hasn't she taken order from Willie before. :)
She got into politics on Willie Brown's staff....................... ;D
-
(https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/908e867773b335d2f33be2c409e077eb06a84773319959afb9bdfbf119ae8d3e.jpg)
-
Yeah, but has she accepted? I thought Willie told her not too. Hasn't she taken order from Willie before. :)
Vote Pedo Joe/Willie Brown’s Ho 2020.
-
This is proof that the dims have given up on winning in November.
Two throwaway candidates.
-
I can’t wait to see them attend their first joint campaign event tomorrow and Biden introduces the crowd to his running mate Susan Rice.
-
-
(https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-akVYSMgBbrY/XzBANCh2gYI/AAAAAAACYzs/EPMm77dAjDcjIhwIj0Nr0tXN7y5trfzBACLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/1%2B1%2Bsdhfskaghfkghfd.jpg)
-
-
(https://media2.giphy.com/media/PgzSQB84aSzmvwWTmk/giphy.gif)
(https://media2.giphy.com/media/PgzSQB84aSzmvwWTmk/giphy.gif)
-
https://twitter.com/CollinsforGA/status/1293290952887537672
-
https://twitter.com/JimHansonDC/status/1293299452241948677
-
NYT calling her a “pragmatic moderate.”
Lib sheep will eat it up and pull the lever for her.
-
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200811/216359a2fd29176903857daf87202b96.jpg)
-
NYT calling her a “pragmatic moderate.”
Lib sheep will eat it up and pull the lever for her.
You will always have the liberal contingent that would vote for a cucumber if you placed a (D) after it.
Kamala is not a likeable person. Her miserable performance during the primaries proved that out. She's not a polished public speaker. Her "bitch face" look doesn't endear her either.
The kill shot that Tulsi took on her during the debates was brutal, and true.
-
https://thenationalpulse.com/editor/kamala-harris-isnt-african-american/
-
Can we make it that we can post pics without having to write something?
-
So, does she not believe Joe's accusers anymore?
-
https://thenationalpulse.com/editor/kamala-harris-isnt-african-american/
Jamaican population is ~90% black or mixed black - the black being of African origin. So she could have some African ancestry. And slavery persisted in Jamaica until 1838, so she could have slaves in her ancestry.
On the other hand, according to Wikipedia “It is uncommon for Jamaicans to identify themselves by race as is prominent in other countries such as the United States, with most Jamaicans seeing Jamaican nationality as an identity in and of itself, identifying as simply being 'Jamaican' regardless of ethnicity.” Actually a lot of Americans identify only as Americans, not by their skin color.
-
So, does she not believe Joe's accusers anymore?
Went searching and found the same question here:
https://thefederalist.com/2020/08/11/flashback-kamala-harris-said-she-believed-bidens-rape-accusers/ (https://thefederalist.com/2020/08/11/flashback-kamala-harris-said-she-believed-bidens-rape-accusers/)
-
She believed his rape accusers before she didn’t care anymore.
-
I am confused what is she again?
10/9/16 California's Kamala Harris first Indian-American to win a US Senate seat
https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/kamala-harris-first-indian-american-wins-us-senate-seat-351014-2016-11-09
8/11/20 Kamala Harris Makes History as First Black Woman VP Nominee
https://www.newsweek.com/kamala-harris-makes-history-first-black-woman-vp-nominee-1521475
-
So, does she not believe Joe's accusers anymore?
She was for them before she was against them...
-
I am confused what is she again?
10/9/16 California's Kamala Harris first Indian-American to win a US Senate seat
https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/kamala-harris-first-indian-american-wins-us-senate-seat-351014-2016-11-09
8/11/20 Kamala Harris Makes History as First Black Woman VP Nominee
https://www.newsweek.com/kamala-harris-makes-history-first-black-woman-vp-nominee-1521475
reality and science doesn't matter... the only thing that matters is how she/he/it self-identifies.... except for republicans.
-
This article speaks very well to what I thought yesterday as Biden picked Kamala.
https://www.redstate.com/shipwreckedcrew/2020/08/11/kamala-harris-primary-campaign-suggests-biden-candidacy-going-down-in-flames/
Did Democrats “Outside” The Biden Campaign Sabotage Him By Pushing Kamala Harris as VP?
I have a lot of thoughts about Kamala Harris and her history with law enforcement in California. Much of that has not been explored in-depth because the left-wing of the Democrat party that controlled the primary process wasn’t really interested in the details. The mere fact that she was a DA in San Franciso, and AG for California, was disqualifying enough — they didn’t need any details.
But I’m going to save those for more in-depth features to come. What I want to focus on here is why Harris’ electoral history, capped by her performance in the 2020 Primary Campaign. I have a nagging suspicion that the people who urged Harris on Biden are not invested in the idea of Biden winning. I suspect the people who urged Harris onto Biden would be happy to see him lose and leave a clear field for the Democrat party nomination for an open White House in 2024.
Harris had never before run for public office before running for District Attorney for the City of San Franciso. She ran for DA in 2003, against a particularly odious incumbent named Terrance Hallinan who had hired her as an Assistant District Attorney in 1998. She had a falling out with the management in Hallinan’s office, and departed. By 2002 she had begun to explore the idea of running against him. By that she had become involved in a long-term romantic relationship with California Assembly Speaker Willie Brown, a noted “power broker” in California Democrat politics in that era.
In a brutal intra-party fight where both candidates had plenty of ethical warts, Harris ended up winning 56-44. She ran unopposed for re-election in 2007.
One year into her second term, in November 2008, Harris announced that she was entering the race for the Office of Attorney General in the 2010 election cycle. She was almost immediately endorsed by Democrat US Senators Diane Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, and newly elected House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, all three of whom were from San Francisco. She won a three-way primary for the Democrat party nominee — but garnered only 33.6% of the statewide vote — her first run for office outside San Francisco, and only her second contested run for office ever. In the general election of the Presidential mid-term year 2010, she faced Republican Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley who led in the polls for most of the race. But in an Oct. 2010 debate, Cooley made the political blunder of complaining about the low salary for the California AG and announced that he intended to collect both a state pension and the AG salary at the same time. Harris hit him with a brutal campaign ad that he was “double-dipping” from taxpayer-funded sources.
On election day Cooley declared victory based on the precinct totals, but as is now so often the case in California, the Democrat candidate Harris closed the margin and prevailed when all the absentee ballots were counted and announced two weeks later.
Barack Obama had carried California in 2008 with 61% of the vote.
Even in the brutal 2010 midterm election for Democrats nationwide, Barbara Boxer was reelected in California to the Senate with 52%.
Jerry Brown regained the Governorship after being out of the office for 27 years with 53%.
Democrats won all 8 statewide elections in 2010, including Kamala Harris’ win as Attorney General.
But only Kamala Harris failed to break 50% in winning her race — she won with only 46.1% of the statewide vote.
In 2014 she managed to win re-election running against a relatively no-name GOP opponent, capturing 57% of the vote. Obama had won 60% of the vote in 2012
That brings us to her run for the Senate seat held by Barbara Boxer when she declined to seek re-election in 2016.
In the non-partisan California “Jungle Primary”, where all candidates run in a single contest, with the top two vote-getters the squaring off in the general election, Harris led the field with 38% of the vote, with a second democrat candidate finishing second with 17%. In the general election — against a Democrat Loretta Sanchez, in now heavily Democrat California — Harris won 61-38.
The take-away from this electoral history is that Harris has never been a terribly strong candidate in a contested race, and she has only once run in a race where she faced a strong ideological opponent — which produced by far her worst performance at the polls when she garnered substantially less than 50% of the vote in strongly Democratic California.
If we now look at the 2020 Presidential Primary Race, we see that Harris had favorable media coverage, a fat campaign war chest funded by California Democrat donors, and began to rise out of single digits in a 15+ candidate field during the summer of 2019.
In the June debate, she scored a broadside on Joe Biden for his opposition to forced busing in the 1970s, and the week following that debate she had climbed to 17% in the polls, up 9 points in a week. At that point she trailed only Biden at 22%, who had dropped 10 points over the same time period following the debate. Their respective paths in the campaign seemed to be set, with Harris prepared to surge past a weakening Biden campaign and march forward to claim the nomination while the more progressive candidates behind her split the far left-wing vote.
Only it never happened. That was the high water mark for the Harris primary campaign. She started a slow slide back to single digits in the polling, and by Thanksgiving the rumors were that she was out of cash. On December 3, 2019, she announced she was withdrawing from the race — before a single ballot was cast. Remaining in the race for the Democrat Party Nomination to take on Donald Trump — all people more favored by the Democrat Party faithful to be their standard-bearer — were the following:
Julian Castro, Marianne Williamson, Corey Booker, John Delaney, Micheal Bennett, Andrew Yang, Deval Patrick, Tom Steyer, and Tulsi Gabbard.
Kamala Harris “finished” the primary race “behind” all of them.
Her background as District Attorney and Attorney General puts her on the wrong side of the “divide” between the parties on the animating issue of the day — Antifa/BLM and the “police reform” protest movement marked by rioters and looting.
There was some constituency in the Democrat establishment pushing for Kamala Harris to be Biden’s VP. It was not the Obama folks, and it was not House Democrats. So whose left among the “power centers” of the Democrat Party?
This leads me to the odd realization that maybe the backers of Kamala Harris for VP aren’t enthusiastic to see Joe Biden win. I do not see the rationale for how her selection, given her electoral history and positioning in the ideological spectrum of the modern party, gain more electoral votes for Joe Biden than she loses for Joe Biden.
Maybe Joe Biden needs to start questioning who his friends really are.
-
https://www.dcclothesline.com/2020/08/12/the-real-kamala-harris/
-
For your reading pleasure. (before they scrub the internet)
https://search.wikileaks.org/?query=%22kamala+harris%22&include_external_sources=True&new_search=True&order_by=most_relevant#results
-
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20200812/d9fff091b49f8ad3aa3895abf8f4effb.jpg)
-
I really don't care that she's a Ho and used sex to gain political favors, jobs and advancement. She is just a huge lightweight, and her policy positions are all based on Identity Politics and false Systemic Racism. She is horrendous and just a pick for a token POC/Female. Sick.
-
The comedy continues.
We are watching the democrat party implode. Stay tuned, it's gonna get even more bizarre.
-
Rut row..........
https://twitter.com/DineshDSouza/status/1293521017432924160
-
I'm sure all that is fake news...
edit: snopes.com has it as "unproven"...That'll be as close as they'll come to admitting it's true.
-
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/08/is_kamala_harris_eligible_to_be_joe_bidens_vp.html
Is Kamala Harris a natural born citizen?
It is no secret that Harris wants to be Joe Biden's vice president. The junior senator from California clearly sees an opening to her real objective: the presidency of the United States. With Biden surprisingly outlasting the other anti-American socialist candidates, Harris recognizes that Biden's age and declining cognitive abilities pose a glorious opportunity to resurrect her presidential ambitions. After all, there is an good chance that the bumbling, incoherent Biden might have to resign or be removed in his first term and his V.P. would succeed him. Even if Biden managed to miraculously finish his first term, it is unlikely that he would or could run for a second.
Harris would love to "back door" her way into the presidency, especially given the fact that her vacuous campaign was an unmitigated disaster, and any future presidential ambitions looked to be a virtual impossibility only a few months ago.
But not so fast. Harris is constitutionally ineligible to be VPOTUS (12th Amendment) or POTUS (Article 2). She is not — nor can she ever be — a natural born citizen, the highest standard of citizenship mandated by the Constitution for the president and commander-in-chief. The Founding Fathers wanted a higher standard of citizenship for the POTUS because they did not want any competing allegiances with foreign governments.
Harris was born in Oakland, California on October 20, 1964, to an Indian citizen mother and a Jamaican citizen father. Thus, Harris is a native-born American citizen, or a citizen pursuant to what I refer to as the anchor baby provision of the 14th Amendment.
I wrote to Senator Harris on Dec. 4, 2017, expressing that the presidential eligibility clause, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 mandates that the president must be a natural born citizen. She and her campaign replied with a form letter that purposely ignored the issue.
But wait, there is more! Harris may be a native-born American citizen by the accident of her birth and in my opinion an erroneous 14th Amendment interpretation, but she is also a citizen of Jamaica.
Under Chapter 2 of the Constitution of Jamaica, a person born in Jamaica after August 5, 1962, or born outside Jamaica after that date to a parent who is a Jamaican citizen, is automatically considered a Jamaican citizen at birth. Furthermore, under current Jamaican legislation, citizens of Jamaica can hold multiple nationalities. And this status does not prohibit serving in the legislature of Jamaica!
Imagine that: a vice president or president of the United States with concurrent citizenship with another foreign government — a person with clearly divided loyalties and an ability and opportunity to participate in governmental proceedings of another country, travel on another country's passport, and legally take up residence in that country.
Specifically, Chapter 2 (entitled Citizenship) of the Jamaica Constitution, Section 3C states:
Every person born outside Jamaica shall become a citizen of Jamaica -
on the sixth day of August 1962, in the case of a person born before that date; or
on the date of his/her birth, in the case of a person born on or after the sixth day of August 1962,
if, at that date, his/her father or mother is a citizen of Jamaica by birth, descent, or registration by virtue of marriage to a citizen of Jamaica.
Harris was born Oct. 20, 1964, and her father was a citizen of Jamaica at the time of her birth. Therefore, the law of Jamaica is clear: Kamala Harris is a citizen of Jamaica, pursuant to Section 3Cb of the Constitution of Jamaica.
And what about citizenship of India? Harris's mother was a citizen of India and, to the best of my knowledge, never actually became an American citizen. Does Kamala qualify for Indian citizenship, too?
No, she does not. Under Indian law, dual citizenship is not allowed. However, Indian law does allow persons of Indian origin certain benefits and privileges. A PIO (persons of Indian origin) card may be issued to those holding U.S. passports, who can prove their Indian origin up to three generations before along with spouses of Indian citizens or persons of Indian origin.
The PIO card is valid for fifteen years and provides the following benefits:
· exemption from registration at a Foreigners' Regional Registration Office (FRRO) for periods of stay less than 180 days
· enjoy parity with non-resident Indians in economic, financial, and educational fields
· acquire, hold, transfer, or dispose of immovable properties in India, except for agricultural properties
· open rupee bank accounts, lend in rupees to Indian residents, and make investments in India, etc.
· being eligible for various housing schemes under the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) or the central or State governments
· their children can obtain admission in educational institutions in India in the general category quota for non-resident Indians
It should be noted that PIO card–holders are not entitled to the following:
· the exercise of any political rights
· visits to restricted or protected areas without permission
· mountaineering, research, and missionary work without permission.
It would be interesting to find out if Harris ever held or currently holds a PIO card.
Thus, Kamala Harris, United States senator, former candidate for the president of the United States, and current prospective candidate for vice president in the upcoming election, has competing foreign citizenship with the country of Jamaica and preferential status with the country of India.
If Harris is picked by Biden, what does that say about the vetting process? Americans would be asked to vote for a ticket that has a foreign citizen candidate — precisely the type of candidate that the Founding Fathers were trying to preclude. What sense does that make? The whole purpose of Article 2 and the natural born citizen requirement is to ensure that the president and commander-in-chief have no foreign influence whatsoever.
Clearly, Kamala Harris has no respect for the Constitution. Her lack of transparency regarding her background combined with her naked political ambition is an affront to all law-abiding citizens and those who seek to uphold the Constitution. Others from both parties have chosen to subvert Article 2 in the past three election cycles. As I said to Senator Harris in my letter more than two and a half years ago, it is time for the American people to be fully informed as to how the elite media and our complicit so-called representatives have subverted the intent and true meaning of the Constitution.
-
Joe Biden: "By putting.....you know......C'mon man!......the black chick.....Kamala Rice......yea, by putting this clean and articulate black woman.....as my......you know the thing......by adding her this will guarantee I'll take California!"
-
(https://i2.wp.com/hardnoxandfriends.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/tb5.jpg?w=474&ssl=1)
-
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/08/is_kamala_harris_eligible_to_be_joe_bidens_vp.html
Whooo boy. Here we go again...............
-
-
https://babylonbee.com/news/report-kamala-harris-already-vetting-vp-picks
-
Rut row..........
https://twitter.com/DineshDSouza/status/1293521017432924160
When you're talking about slaves, I believe the correct verb is "owned".
-
When you're talking about slaves, I believe the correct verb is "owned".
When you are contending with antifa scum murdering anyone they think might speak loudly against them, censorship seems so much better, I suppose.
-
This is just too easy! LOL!!!!!!!!
https://www.redstate.com/sister-toldjah/2020/08/13/video-tucker-carlson-gets-assist-from-biden-in-owning-cnn-oliver-darcy-throws-tantrum-in-response/
Tucker Carlson took complete ownership of CNN on Wednesday night and he did it with an inadvertent assist from Joe Biden. Let’s start with the backstory first just so you’ll understand how hilarious the ownership – and Oliver Darcy’s meltdown over it – was.
It all started on Tuesday when Carlson mispronounced Democratic vice-presidential candidate Kamala Harris’ name during an interview he did with former Hillary Clinton adviser Richard Goodstein. Heated words were exchanged after Goodstein took major issue with it, and with Carlson saying it was unintentional and that Goodstein’s real issue with him was that he had the audacity to criticize Harris.
As he does every night, Darcy was monitoring Carlson’s program and tweeted that “Tucker says this was unintentional, but he does often mispronounce the names of people he is critical of. It’s sort of a thing on his show. Seems pretty intentional!”
Darcy was so “concerned” about the matter that he included it in his Tuesday night newsletter. He characterized it as Carlson “mocking” Harris’ name. “He kept doing so after his guest corrected him,” CNN’s junior hall monitor noted, with the clear insination that racism was behind this.
Fast forward to Wednesday night, when Carlson made both CNN and Darcy a topic in one of his segments because in addition to Darcy, a panel of CNNers including “New Day” co-anchor John Berman also took a ding at Carlson over the mispronunciation, with one contributor, in particular, erupting in outrage – as Carlson shows in the clip.
During Carlson’s segment, as you’ll see below, Carlson talked about Oliver Darcy’s criticism over saying Kamala Harris’ name. But in doing so he didn’t mention Darcy’s name once. In fact, it appears Darcy’s name was intentionally left off the screengrab of the tweet Darcy posted from the night before.
But it was towards the end of the segment where things got really hilarious. As Carlson pointed out that his critics were suggesting that merely mispronouncing her name was “racist”, he segued to a clip from earlier in the day of Biden introducing Harris as his running mate by … mispronouncing her name.
Watch:
https://twitter.com/supramayro1/status/1293740808475160576
-
-
When you're talking about slaves, I believe the correct verb is "owned".
I noticed the word “employed.” Come on Dinesh...lost opportunity. Smh
-
This is just too easy! LOL!!!!!!!!
https://www.redstate.com/sister-toldjah/2020/08/13/video-tucker-carlson-gets-assist-from-biden-in-owning-cnn-oliver-darcy-throws-tantrum-in-response/
https://twitter.com/supramayro1/status/1293740808475160576
It is truly amazing how easily some people get offended... and quite telling.
Almost no one correctly pronounces my last name. And I have a very simple last name. Big whoop.
and consider how many people don't know how to pronounce the spanish surname "Perez" (and I don't know how to put the accent in there)
but anyway, now we know how yet another way to easily trigger some of the libs.
-
6 reasons to oppose Harris:
https://pjmedia.com/election/tyler-o-neil/2019/01/21/6-reasons-to-oppose-nanny-state-tyrant-kamala-harris-in-2020-n44533
-
6 reasons to oppose Harris:
https://pjmedia.com/election/tyler-o-neil/2019/01/21/6-reasons-to-oppose-nanny-state-tyrant-kamala-harris-in-2020-n44533
Harris is a complete horror show.
-
Harris is a complete horror whore show.
FTFY ;D