PILOT SPIN
Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: nddons on March 09, 2021, 08:21:16 AM
-
Hundreds of pages of emails and other documents obtained by Wisconsin Spotlight show that grant money from private left leaning groups, funded largely by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, resulted in Democrat activists infiltrating the November presidential election in Wisconsin’s five largest cities.
Here’s what the emails and Wisconsin Spotlight’s investigation found:
A former Democratic operative, Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein, served as a de facto elections administrator and had access to Green Bay’s absentee ballots days before the election
Spitzer-Rubenstein asked Green Bay’s clerk if he and his team members could help correct or “cure” absentee ballots like they did in Milwaukee.
Green Bay’s clerk grew increasingly frustrated with the takeover of her department by the Democrat Mayor’s staff and outside groups.
Brown County Clerk Sandy Juno said the contract stipulated that Spitzer-Rubenstein would have four of the five keys to the KI Center ballroom where ballots were stored and counted.
Brown County’s clerk said the city of Green Bay “went rogue.”
Election law experts said the city illegally gave left-leaning groups authority over the election.
https://wisconsinspotlight.com/special-investigation-infiltrating-the-election/?fbclid=IwAR2qqdAClIFrvuvJxBtpEnsj8xfnwwv9609X9soeMqz_zHijv4uCnyGGZBg
-
Too bad nothing will come of this.
-
Who is "Wisconsin Spotlight", and why should I believe anything they say? All I see is a website.
-
LALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALA
-
Who is "Wisconsin Spotlight", and why should I believe anything they say? All I see is a website.
What you meant to say is, "why would any sane person listen a fucking thing your dumb ass has to say about anything, including genetics?"
Fucking troll.
-
Who is "Wisconsin Spotlight", and why should I believe anything they say? All I see is a website.
I have the same concern with regard to the New York Times.
They do link to a document containing the emails at the beginning of the article . Did you not see that? And if the claims or evidence are false or invented, don’t you think a rich man like Zuckerberg would sue for libel?
-
Who is "Wisconsin Spotlight", and why should I believe anything they say? All I see is a website.
Well they claim they got public record emails, which can easily be verified.
State Rep. Janel Brandtjen (R-Menomonee Falls) who chairs the Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections, said the Green Bay emails, first obtained by state Rep. Shae Sortwell (R-Two Rivers) through an open records request, will be front and center at a hearing before the elections committee Wednesday.
And this is nothing different from what the Democrats admitted doing in the Time article: Conspired to win the election through organized, coordinated effort.
But it’s a fair question.
-
Who is "Wisconsin Spotlight", and why should I believe anything they say? All I see is a website.
The author, Matt Kiddle, is a 30-year investigative reporter in the state of Wisconsin. He is well trusted in Wisconsin.
He also works for the MacIver institute, a Wisconsin-based think tank that promotes free markets, individual freedom, personal responsibility and limited government. All foreign concepts to you.
-
The author, Matt Kiddle, is a 30-year investigative reporter in the state of Wisconsin. He is well trusted in Wisconsin.
He also works for the MacIver institute, a Wisconsin-based think tank that promotes free markets, individual freedom, personal responsibility and limited government. All foreign concepts to you.
In other words he's a conservative hack. Or has he actually done, well, journalism? That is, reported actual news to some sort of actual news outlet?
-
In other words he's a conservative hack. Or has he actually done, well, journalism? That is, reported actual news to some sort of actual news outlet?
Gee, someone backing up their journalism with FACTS.
Yet another concept foreign to you.
-
In other words he's a conservative hack. Or has he actually done, well, journalism? That is, reported actual news to some sort of actual news outlet?
which outlets actually have, ya know, journalists?
-
In other words he's a conservative hack. Or has he actually done, well, journalism? That is, reported actual news to some sort of actual news outlet?
There are links to the facts in the story. You should be able to make your own decision on the validity of the story.
You think the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel would print a story like this that contradicts their far left stance? Is naïveté a major at your university?
Conservatives are on our own now. The print press and other media is no longer the fourth estate. They have become the fifth column. If you’re waiting for CNN or The NY Times to give you their imprimatur on stories like this, then you’re insulating yourself from other truths that are out there that may challenge your world view.
-
which outlets actually have, ya know, journalists?
He means only those approved by his communist masters.
He’s a fucking troll.
-
In other words he's a conservative hack. Or has he actually done, well, journalism? That is, reported actual news to some sort of actual news outlet?
Your "actual news outlets" have all be hijacked by the radical, far left and are now PURELY Democrat Propaganda, but you can't see that because you're ok with the growing Totalitarian Oppression.
-
There are links to the facts in the story. You should be able to make your own decision on the validity of the story.
Actually, no I can't. That's why I ask the questions I do. You guys see something you like therefore it must be true. I tend to think about things a bit more deeply, or at least I try.
You think the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel would print a story like this that contradicts their far left stance? Is naïveté a major at your university?
Were this for real, absolutely. My litmus test has always been Fox News. Despite its Opinion content that I feel borders on and sometimes traverses in the realm of fantasy, they do employ journalists and aren't in the habit of spreading overt falsehoods. It is clear the Zukerberg spent lots of money in Wisconsin. Then again, he's a private's citizen and entitled to do so.
Conservatives are on our own now. The print press and other media is no longer the fourth estate. They have become the fifth column. If you’re waiting for CNN or The NY Times to give you their imprimatur on stories like this, then you’re insulating yourself from other truths that are out there that may challenge your world view.
[/quote]
-
Actually, no I can't. That's why I ask the questions I do. You guys see something you like therefore it must be true. I tend to think about things a bit more deeply, or at least I try.
Were this for real, absolutely. My litmus test has always been Fox News. Despite its Opinion content that I feel borders on and sometimes traverses in the realm of fantasy, they do employ journalists and aren't in the habit of spreading overt falsehoods. It is clear the Zukerberg spent lots of money in Wisconsin. Then again, he's a private's citizen and entitled to do so.
Conservatives are on our own now. The print press and other media is no longer the fourth estate. They have become the fifth column. If you’re waiting for CNN or The NY Times to give you their imprimatur on stories like this, then you’re insulating yourself from other truths that are out there that may challenge your world view.
Ask Dinesh D'Souza about donating money. Zukerberg just has a better lawyer.
-
Ask Dinesh D'Souza about donating money. Zukerberg just has a better lawyer.
Are you saying Zuckerberg has made illegal campaign contributions?
-
Are you saying Zuckerberg has made illegal campaign contributions?
More likely that Dinesh D'Souza made legal campaign contributions, like Zuckerberg, but was charged because he is an outspoken conservative. Thus, Zuckerberg's lawyer must have been better than D'Souza's or D'souza would not have been convicted.