PILOT SPIN

Spin Zone => Spin Zone => Topic started by: Lucifer on January 03, 2023, 06:30:03 PM

Title: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Lucifer on January 03, 2023, 06:30:03 PM
We’re witnessing the UniParty telling everyone to just vote for the person we tell you we want.

It’s time to pick a Speaker from the outside. 
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Little Joe on January 03, 2023, 06:39:29 PM
The "no-compromise" faction of the GOP are either going to get a Democrat speaker or they will finally nominate a castrated and crippled R to fill the bill.

Yeah, I know; "compromise" is a bad word here, but without compromise, you lose almost every time.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: nddons on January 03, 2023, 06:41:21 PM
The time has come and gone. I love the Freedom Caucus but they didn’t put up and make the case for any other candidate.

I truly fear some Susan Colins-type RINO congressmen will vote for Jeffries just to spite the Caucus and we will have a democrat speaker.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Lucifer on January 03, 2023, 07:19:41 PM
We won’t get a democrat speaker.   But we will get a UniParty speaker.   

The swamp “it’s his/her turn” mentality has to stop.  McCarthy is a pitiful choice for speaker, he was Paul Ryan’s right hand man.  He’ll be a disaster, just like his mentor. 

McCarthy is busy tonight buying those votes, and he’ll get them. 
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Lucifer on January 03, 2023, 07:30:49 PM
McCarthy moving into the speaker’s office yesterday was bad optics.   

He has had months to shore up his bid, yet he did nothing because in the UniParty it’s “his turn”. 

Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on January 03, 2023, 08:01:02 PM
McCarthy moving into the speaker’s office yesterday was bad optics.   

He has had months to shore up his bid, yet he did nothing because in the UniParty it’s “his turn”.
It was beyond bad optics it was plain arrogance.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on January 03, 2023, 08:02:43 PM
The time has come and gone. I love the Freedom Caucus but they didn’t put up and make the case for any other candidate.

I truly fear some Susan Colins-type RINO congressmen will vote for Jeffries just to spite the Caucus and we will have a democrat speaker.
Matt Gaetz did nominate JJ
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on January 03, 2023, 08:07:43 PM
And now this.....
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Number7 on January 03, 2023, 08:30:24 PM
Jim Jordan is the left’s worst nightmare.

He nominated mccarthy, I think, to set himself up to receive votes from the swamp dwellers because he knew mccarthy was doa.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: nddons on January 03, 2023, 08:37:17 PM
Matt Gaetz did nominate JJ
And Jim Jordan nominated McCarthy for speaker before 2nd vote.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Anthony on January 04, 2023, 03:06:52 AM
The "no-compromise" faction of the GOP are either going to get a Democrat speaker or they will finally nominate a castrated and crippled R to fill the bill.

Yeah, I know; "compromise" is a bad word here, but without compromise, you lose almost every time.

Totally disagree.  We've compromised for decades and lose ground every time.  They don't compromise.  They TAKE rights, liberties and freedom every time.  It's now critical.  I'm done with both parties and this country in general.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Rush on January 04, 2023, 05:22:42 AM
Totally disagree.  We've compromised for decades and lose ground every time.  They don't compromise.  They TAKE rights, liberties and freedom every time.  It's now critical.  I'm done with both parties and this country in general.

Yep.  Maybe a dem speaker will help drive the country into the ground and create a huge MAGA red wave in 2024 which if the Uniparty cheats us out again we can just revolt/secede.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on January 04, 2023, 05:56:09 AM
 I can't imagine enough Republicans voting for Jeffries to get him elected.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Little Joe on January 04, 2023, 06:14:44 AM
I can't imagine enough Republicans voting for Jeffries to get him elected.
Wouldn't that depend on who counts the votes?
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Username on January 04, 2023, 07:57:23 AM
Wouldn't that depend on who counts the votes?
200 mail-in votes were just discovered.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Number7 on January 04, 2023, 05:36:47 PM
The "no-compromise" faction of the GOP are either going to get a Democrat speaker or they will finally nominate a castrated and crippled R to fill the bill.

Yeah, I know; "compromise" is a bad word here, but without compromise, you lose almost every time.

One doesn’t compromise with evil.

If those words are too difficult to understand, when was the last time the democrats kept their word after republicans caved in?
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Lucifer on January 05, 2023, 06:12:46 AM
(https://i.imgur.com/PQ5anQK.jpg)
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on January 05, 2023, 07:08:16 AM
McCarthy has a PAC. My belief is the PAC exists for him to buy people's loyalty.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on January 05, 2023, 08:55:01 AM
Our government is beyond a joke at this point. The speaker becomes President if the two top imposters are removed, which has to happen. President McCarthy? A liar, grifter and arrogant power seeker?

As long as there is no speaker, if the two top imposters are removed, the next in line is President pro tempore of the Senate, which bizarrely enough is my slack-jawed globalist sycophant Patty Murray, who just wanders around waiting for someone to tell her what to do.

And next is Secretary of State Blinken.

I’m moving closer into the We’re Screwed camp, while trying to maintain hope that we’re not.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Rush on January 05, 2023, 09:35:33 AM
I feel better listening to Styx about it.  MAGA is standing up for principles.  I could get behind Byron Donalds, LOL!

https://rumble.com/v23z7c6-uniparty-meltdown-house-gop-holdouts-nominate-byron-donalds-reject-kevin-mc.html

His last sentence about Crenshaw LOL!
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on January 05, 2023, 10:13:31 AM
I feel better listening to Styx about it.  MAGA is standing up for principles.  I could get behind Byron Donalds, LOL!

https://rumble.com/v23z7c6-uniparty-meltdown-house-gop-holdouts-nominate-byron-donalds-reject-kevin-mc.html (https://rumble.com/v23z7c6-uniparty-meltdown-house-gop-holdouts-nominate-byron-donalds-reject-kevin-mc.html)

His last sentence about Crenshaw LOL!
Someone posted a fake letter backing Donalds as if it came from Trump.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: nddons on January 05, 2023, 11:07:32 AM
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1610943833054842880?t=4lwLrj2nwcib_GECHq5OQw&s=07

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20230105/b66f8252eceb5093e9357f114cfa4c1d.jpg)
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Number7 on January 05, 2023, 12:01:51 PM
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1610943833054842880?t=4lwLrj2nwcib_GECHq5OQw&s=07

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20230105/b66f8252eceb5093e9357f114cfa4c1d.jpg)

That would DEFINITELY hurt.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on January 05, 2023, 12:02:30 PM
Kevin "The Great" lost again.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: nddons on January 05, 2023, 12:20:08 PM
Matt Gaetz nominated Trump for Speaker.

And the clown show continues.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Lucifer on January 05, 2023, 12:44:17 PM
Matt Gaetz nominated Trump for Speaker.

And the clown show continues.

This is not a clown show.  It’s a few representatives doing what they’ve been elected to do. 

When was the last time we saw the whole house debate anything?   The politburo scheme that the house has devolved into needs shaking up. 

McCarthy is responsible.  He sat back awaiting his turn without any policy whatsoever.  Now his back is against the wall.  He has to decide on the will of the voters or his loyalty to the Uniparty.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on January 05, 2023, 01:37:54 PM
I feel better listening to Styx about it.  MAGA is standing up for principles.  I could get behind Byron Donalds, LOL!

https://rumble.com/v23z7c6-uniparty-meltdown-house-gop-holdouts-nominate-byron-donalds-reject-kevin-mc.html

His last sentence about Crenshaw LOL!

Yes, it says a lot when one feels more comfortable with the idea of an unknown as President, like Donalds, than with the sitting imposter.

(http://)
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Number7 on January 05, 2023, 04:28:29 PM
Matt Gaetz nominated Trump for Speaker.

And the clown show continues.

What makes you think that congress should represent their own interests instead of the citizens that pay for everything?
That's what this fight is about.
Sorry if having to FORCE rinos to behave with some integrity offends you.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on January 05, 2023, 04:51:50 PM
https://rumble.com/v240piu-matt-gaetz-on-.html

https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1611054758739185667?s=20&t=JqNYKpYSN0BwVfk54y_Juw

https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1611034866363269121?s=20&t=JqNYKpYSN0BwVfk54y_Juw

https://gab.com/Spacecowboy777/posts/109637844486786822

What we’re seeing is what the founders intended. They knew a backroom-designated candidate should not be shunted into power.


Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Rush on January 05, 2023, 06:18:06 PM
I’m done with Crenshaw.  He called the 20 “narcissists, enemies and terrorists.”  That’s what he thinks of the members standing up for us against the uniparty destroying our country.

 :'(  >:(
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on January 05, 2023, 06:49:05 PM
Yes. May “The Twenty” help right our ship. A Navy Seal elected to Congress, doing the right thing.

https://gab.com/wendyrogersaz/posts/109639509767651809
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Lucifer on January 05, 2023, 07:00:11 PM
I’m done with Crenshaw.  He called the 20 “narcissists, enemies and terrorists.”  That’s what he thinks of the members standing up for us against the uniparty destroying our country.

 :'(  >:(

  Eye Patch McCain wants his place at the table of the UniParty.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Lucifer on January 05, 2023, 07:01:44 PM
(https://media.gab.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=700,quality=100,fit=scale-down/system/media_attachments/files/124/336/310/original/671d386f24639016.jpg)
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on January 05, 2023, 08:25:01 PM
My fav Bongino quote comes to mind, "There are no Democrats that act like Republicans but there are Republicans that act like Democrats"

Currently they are outing themselves as are so many pundits.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: nddons on January 06, 2023, 03:21:04 AM
This is not a clown show.  It’s a few representatives doing what they’ve been elected to do. 

When was the last time we saw the whole house debate anything?   The politburo scheme that the house has devolved into needs shaking up. 

McCarthy is responsible.  He sat back awaiting his turn without any policy whatsoever.  Now his back is against the wall.  He has to decide on the will of the voters or his loyalty to the Uniparty.
In principle I’m not against the 20. I like kicking the swamp as much as anyone. But the 20 never presented their own candidate who could successfully challenge McCarthy. Jim Jordan would be great (Chip Roy would be better, and Clay Higgins would be my top choice) but Jordan never ran for it, tried to Caucus for it, or made his own case. Fine.  So instead of presenting their own candidate, they wanted concessions. Again, great. From what I gather (and it’s impossible to know all the facts) McCarthy has agreed to those terms. So if that’s true (and I can’t know for sure), what is the end game? 

You don’t engage in battle without an definable objective, and sufficient weaponry. I sense the 20 have neither. Sometimes you have to lick your wounds and come back to fight the next fight.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: nddons on January 06, 2023, 03:22:49 AM
I’m done with Crenshaw.  He called the 20 “narcissists, enemies and terrorists.”  That’s what he thinks of the members standing up for us against the uniparty destroying our country.

 :'(  >:(
Yea, fuck Crenshaw. Such a disappointment. I used to follow him but no longer.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: nddons on January 06, 2023, 03:24:10 AM
  Eye Patch McCain wants his place at the table of the UniParty.
“Eye Patch McCain.”  In stealing that!  Love it.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Lucifer on January 06, 2023, 04:09:16 AM
Watching Fox and CNN spin this is hilarious.  “Gloom!”  “Doom!”   The ditzy females on CNN who pose as political experts is a joke. 

The establishment wants McLoser in the speaker position, as well as the UniParty.   The pigs have been feasting at the trough and want more. 

Any way you cut this, the establishment and Uniparty are very worried right now.   The idea of two years without mega money give aways terrify them. 
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on January 06, 2023, 05:40:15 AM
In principle I’m not against the 20. I like kicking the swamp as much as anyone. But the 20 never presented their own candidate who could successfully challenge McCarthy. Jim Jordan would be great (Chip Roy would be better, and Clay Higgins would be my top choice) but Jordan never ran for it, tried to Caucus for it, or made his own case. Fine.  So instead of presenting their own candidate, they wanted concessions. Again, great. From what I gather (and it’s impossible to know all the facts) McCarthy has agreed to those terms. So if that’s true (and I can’t know for sure), what is the end game? 

You don’t engage in battle without an definable objective, and sufficient weaponry. I sense the 20 have neither. Sometimes you have to lick your wounds and come back to fight the next fight.
Let McCarthy drop out and we'll see how it progresses.  I think Scalise is probably a non-starter also.

Wouldn't you think McCarthy would be embarrassed by now?  His arrogance in moving into the speaker's office is beyond belief.  He has his PAC and was using it to buy off people.  Are those all good signs of what you want in a speaker?  Maybe the Ukraine lapel ping and pocket handkerchief are part of it too, guess he's willing to be part of the let's fund Ukraine forever crowd while the little Dictator over there keeps consolidating his power.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Rush on January 06, 2023, 07:19:03 AM
In principle I’m not against the 20. I like kicking the swamp as much as anyone. But the 20 never presented their own candidate who could successfully challenge McCarthy. Jim Jordan would be great (Chip Roy would be better, and Clay Higgins would be my top choice) but Jordan never ran for it, tried to Caucus for it, or made his own case. Fine.  So instead of presenting their own candidate, they wanted concessions. Again, great. From what I gather (and it’s impossible to know all the facts) McCarthy has agreed to those terms. So if that’s true (and I can’t know for sure), what is the end game? 

You don’t engage in battle without an definable objective, and sufficient weaponry. I sense the 20 have neither. Sometimes you have to lick your wounds and come back to fight the next fight.

If those terms include a requirement that all bills be single subject then it will be worth it.  IF that can be enforced.  It needs to include a way to remove McCarthy from speaker if he goes back on the promise.  I would accept those terms, it would be a step in the right direction.  At the very least, McCarthy has been soundly rebuked, a message has been sent to DC GOP that the people are fed up with the status quo. And hopefully an education has been given to the young idiots ignorant of history that debate and conflict is a GOOD thing.  It's the opposite of a ruling party all in lockstep you cannot break apart - therein lies the danger.

Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Number7 on January 06, 2023, 07:25:09 AM
In principle I’m not against the 20. I like kicking the swamp as much as anyone. But the 20 never presented their own candidate who could successfully challenge McCarthy. Jim Jordan would be great (Chip Roy would be better, and Clay Higgins would be my top choice) but Jordan never ran for it, tried to Caucus for it, or made his own case. Fine.  So instead of presenting their own candidate, they wanted concessions. Again, great. From what I gather (and it’s impossible to know all the facts) McCarthy has agreed to those terms. So if that’s true (and I can’t know for sure), what is the end game? 

You don’t engage in battle without an definable objective, and sufficient weaponry. I sense the 20 have neither. Sometimes you have to lick your wounds and come back to fight the next fight.

The way the country is headed, if there isn't a FULL STOP to the swamp agenda, there will be no country one day sooner than later.

But there won't have been any mean tweets, or interruption of the status quo, so you'll have that.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: nddons on January 06, 2023, 09:50:32 PM
It looks and sounds there is a deal with Gaetz and McCarthy for this 15th vote.

Good on Gaetz and Boebert succeeding in getting all their concessions from McCarthy. 
Title: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: nddons on January 06, 2023, 10:05:25 PM
WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a shocking overnight vote held by the House of Representatives, the QAnon Shaman, aka "The Buffalo Guy" has received the majority of votes required to become Speaker of the House.

"I mean, at this point, why not?" said Representative Chip Roy. "Maybe we need a guy like this to shake things up."

https://babylonbee.com/news/in-11-hour-vote-buffalo-guy-elected-speaker-of-the-house?utm_source=The+Babylon+Bee+Newsletter&utm_medium=email&fbclid=IwAR1qe6H9PIu_29k2vUCBlocnmxHuULu3ZHLOFoSfPlmDH8xZummXcpXkbi8&mibextid=Zxz2cZ
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on January 07, 2023, 07:11:56 AM
Why “concessions?” Why not pick someone who will DO THE RIGHT THINGS WITHOUT BEING FORCED TO?

Trusting swamp creatures to keep promises is folly.

It’s obvious our “leaders” don’t want to be held accountable and do NOT want to clean up the swamp.



Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Rush on January 07, 2023, 09:10:44 AM
Why “concessions?” Why not pick someone who will DO THE RIGHT THINGS WITHOUT BEING FORCED TO?

Trusting swamp creatures to keep promises is folly.

It’s obvious our “leaders” don’t want to be held accountable and do NOT want to clean up the swamp.

There was no way they would have convinced enough of the 200 even if they did have a viable candidate which they didn’t. Donalds and Jordan withdrew.  My own rep was one of the 200 and he will be hearing from me.

They did a great job getting the most possible out of the situation. McCarthy was going to end up getting it all along and they managed to make some lemonade out of it including some controls to keep him accountable.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Lucifer on January 07, 2023, 09:19:01 AM
Watching the establishment and UniParty melt down this morning is worth it.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: nddons on January 07, 2023, 06:10:21 PM
There was no way they would have convinced enough of the 200 even if they did have a viable candidate which they didn’t. Donalds and Jordan withdrew.  My own rep was one of the 200 and he will be hearing from me.

They did a great job getting the most possible out of the situation. McCarthy was going to end up getting it all along and they managed to make some lemonade out of it including some controls to keep him accountable.
That’s how I see it as well.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Number7 on January 07, 2023, 08:34:22 PM
Why “concessions?” Why not pick someone who will DO THE RIGHT THINGS WITHOUT BEING FORCED TO?

Trusting swamp creatures to keep promises is folly.

It’s obvious our “leaders” don’t want to be held accountable and do NOT want to clean up the swamp.

Why concessions is the wrong question.

The rules were what they were.

The 20 played within the rules and forced the criminal left off their pedestal. That’s what they are furious about.

Our inside is not supposed to win,and they fuck with the rules constantly to make sure.

Matt and Lauren WON the concessions the swamp does not want us to have and they will persecute our side for decades for having played by the rules and won.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on January 08, 2023, 04:25:27 AM
This is the proposed rules package  https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20230102/BILLS-118hresPIH-118th-rules-of-the-house-of-reps-V3.pdf

We'll see if what gets passed is anything like this.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: nddons on January 08, 2023, 10:09:20 AM
https://twitter.com/emeriticus/status/1611765224780222464?t=rpqqS9NAc4fSmeQ9qxferw&s=07
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Lucifer on January 10, 2023, 06:12:32 PM
EyePatch McCain show's his true colors again.

https://twitter.com/itsSpencerBrown/status/1612930586447839235?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1612930586447839235%7Ctwgr%5Ed7647072c1ac0c7b6bcb4ed17c99452bcbc4c3b4%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcitizenfreepress.com%2Fbreaking%2Fhouse-creates-weaponization-of-federal-govt-special-committee%2F
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on January 10, 2023, 07:33:08 PM
One reply says he is out of town for a Seal funeral.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: EppyGA - White Christian Domestic Terrorist on January 11, 2023, 12:04:32 PM
Maybe they should have elected Donalds

https://twitter.com/BoSnerdley/status/1613170775846002689?s=20
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Little Joe on January 11, 2023, 12:42:07 PM
Maybe they should have elected Donalds

I would like to have seen that.  But would that make me a racist?  According to a chart posted recently it would.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on January 11, 2023, 01:07:43 PM
I would like to have seen that.  But would that make me a racist?  According to a chart posted recently it would.
You’re only a racist if you notice that Donalds is black, AND/OR if you don’t notice that he is black.
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Becky (My pronouns are Assigned/By/God) on January 25, 2023, 08:04:49 AM
I’m totally okay with this.

https://gab.com/B_Boop/posts/109748410484488717
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: Jim Logajan on January 25, 2023, 09:58:35 AM
I’m totally okay with this.

https://gab.com/B_Boop/posts/109748410484488717

He grew some balls?
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: nddons on January 25, 2023, 10:41:55 AM
I’m totally okay with this.

https://gab.com/B_Boop/posts/109748410484488717
I’m sure this will appear on national media like CNN and MSNBC tonight. 

(No green font in Tapatalk or henceforth NGFIT)
Title: Re: It’s Time to pick a Speaker that’s not in Congress
Post by: nddons on January 25, 2023, 10:42:36 AM
He grew some balls?
I actually think he has.