16111
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
But Dershowitz disagreed.
"If Congress were ever to charge him with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional authority under Article II, we'd have a constitutional crisis," he said.
The famed attorney explained “clearly illegal acts” on the president’s part would need to be proven.
"There's never been a case in history where a president has been charged with obstruction of justice for merely exercising his constitutional authority. That would cause a constitutional crisis in the United States," Dershowitz said, hoping Special Counsel Robert Mueller understands that.
"And Sen. Feinstein simply doesn't know what she's talking about when she says it's obstruction of justice to do what a president is completely authorized to do under the Constitution."
Of course, the Number 7 could also come from the time you won that card game with a pair of fours...
...and you (ave no talent for insults.
It’s really pathetic how shallow, predictable, and just plain, boring you are.
Now I believe that you do work with kids. And it shows. You sound like a 3rd grader.
At least they cover all the news, good or bad.
I often listen to other news media (CNN, NBC, MSNBC, ABC, etc.
If I hear something good about the Dems or bad about Trump, I will often switch to Fox to see the "other side". Inevitably Fox will cover the topic.
But when listening to FOX, if I hear something bad about Dems or something good about Trump, when I switch to one of the others, they will be talking about something else; usually something bad about Trump. Half of their lies are lies of omission. It is easy to see why Libs that refuse to watch or listen to Fox have no idea what is really going on in Washington.
And you display the limits of your reading comprehension. I would never knowingly defend a despot like the North Korean Dictator, or as he might be more realitically labeled, their king. True dictatorships are usually not dynastic in the modern age.
I was trying to illustrate his motivations in his actions. Wisdom is the ability to see things past the lens of your own experience. If you understand something about the other guy you’re likely to make better decisions. Super Fragile Ego Extra Braggadocious has gotten rid of a great many of the people in the State department who really understood the other guys. We are collectively the poorer for it.
You prefer the blunderings of your Bigot in Chief, since in your eyes he can do no wrong. I prefer someone who thinks carefully about what’s going on before spouting off their big gob.
Funny, millions have said the same about Obama's "signature legislation" posing as a health care bill.
Kim Jun Un is neither crazy nor irrational. As others have wisely pointed out, he has invested heavily in nuclear weaponry to keep us at bay. His motivation is to keep himself and his dynasty in power. He isn’t likely to stage a first strike on us, since he knows his dynasty would be destroyed in the aftermath.
I could see a nuclear strike on us as a last desperate measure after the territorial integrity of North Korea wa abrogated due to an invasion. Easiest way to forestall that is to not invade.
Unfortunately, the bombastic verbiage from Hair Fuerer is just making things worse. It allows Kim Jun Il to truthfully paint himself as standing firm against a foreign aggressor. This will do nothing but endear him to his followers.
I am amazed he can keep power though. A soldier who recently defected from there (he had to evade a fullisade of gunfire to do it) has malnutrition and was full of intestinal worms. If this is the state of the soldiery things are far worse than I could of imagined. The first rule of dictatorship is you kept the soldiers well fed, well paid, and happy.