The Democrats are allowing the radical nut jobs to speak for their whole party; the traitorous Somali bitch with the head scarf, the bartender cunt, and the vapid ex-VP etc.

There are sane Democrats, like Fetterman. And Bill Maher, who claims he isn’t technically a Democrat but who votes with them 90% of the time, has come out in support of what Trump is doing in Iran. Why? Because he is a champion of women’s rights, and, unlike the woke cult, is walking the walk when somebody takes kinetic action to actually free women from brutal oppression. Whereas the end-stage TDS suffering leftist “feminists” turn utterly hypocrite when it’s Trump freeing these women. Because they don’t actually care about women’s rights, just narcissistic virtue signaling and feeding their hatred of Trump, America, and Western Civilization in general.

I almost "liked" this post because I agree with nearly everything in it... but what has Ilhan Omar done that is actually treasonous?

I’ve read what you wrote.  It’s humorous that you are alleging conservatives are “demonizing” and “attributing evil intent”.   

Is this like using “Nazi” over and over, or “White Christian Nationalism”, or even “KKK”, and let’s kick in the ever popular “racist!”.

Can you point me to where conservatives are doing this?

The first two posts in this thread right here, for starters: http://www.pilotspin.com/index.php?topic=8580.0

The post by Number 7 at the top of page 4 in this thread is another example - lots of invective about how Democrats love to be controlled. I don't have time to look for other examples right now, but look for yourself and you'll find plenty of claims right here that Democrats are communists, traitors, sick, pedophiles and/or in bed with pedophiles...

It's NOT just the Right by any means, the Left does it too. Both sides are convinced the other side isn't just wrong, but stupid, demented, evil,... pick the pejorative of your choice.

I realize it's probably tilting at windmills to point this out here, where people are largely convinced that Democrats are are all these terrible things and I don't expect to change any minds. I just can't read that sort of thing and stay silent - and it's so widespread that I wonder whether this country isn't headed for civil war.

  Sitting back and remaining quiet is what is expected from these authoritarians.  This is why the democrat party has also embraced censorship.  Censorship is an important tool in an overthrow just as we are seeing the constant barrage of misinformation (MSM) and the confusion of genders, etc.

 Again, anyone who blindly votes democrat is enabling the slide. Not speaking up against that?  Also enabling.

There you go again. Reread what i wrote - what I actually wrote, rather than your interpretation. I never said don't speak up against them. There's a big difference between opposing someone's ideas and policies and demonizing them personally, attributing evil intent.

No one should blindly vote anything, Republican, Democrat, or anything else.

I realize you depend upon the MSM for your information, but yes, for several decades (more recently) many democrats supported a dictator named Fidel Castro.   Starting with BHO, then you had Karen Bass, Bobby Rush, Laura Richardson, Barbara Lee and others.  Even Bernie Sanders expressed his support of the Cuban revolution then try to say he thought Castro was too authoritarian.

Right, lots of left wingnuts supported Castro. Throw in Jane Fonda for good measure. Doesn't prove anything.

Yet we have them complaining the US had no right to apprehend him.

From a purely legal perspective they might be correct. I'd go so far as to say that it's the opposition's job to challenge what the party in power does - one of the motivators behind Congressional oversight. Shouldn't be while hostilities are in progress though.

  Don't kid yourself, he had his admirers in US politics and if they could he would be set free.

I have no doubt that's true, but it's far from the party's position, or even the majority position.

No it's not.  As the democrat party has embraced Marxism it's the next logical step for them.

  The extreme progressive left now runs the democrat party.

Oh, they'd like to. But again, I don't think this is a fait accompli, at least not yet. Keep pushing extreme rhetoric, though, and it's likely to come to pass.

The party as a whole has NOT embraced Marxism... so far. What worries me is that so many Gen Z'ers see nothing wrong with so-called Democratic Socialism. Do you think Mamdani's victory was just a NYC thing? I think it's an ominous sign. I can't find the reference right now, but I recently saw a projection that Gen Z and the Millennials will dominate the voting demographics by some date - 2035 I think it was, might have been sooner.

The worst thing we can do is demonize the Democrat party as a whole. All that does is push people who are not sold on MAGA further into the hands of a party that is trending ever further leftward. There is, after all, such a thing as a self-fulfilling prophecy.

You're exactly right.  It's not so much that the democrats love tyrants.  They hate everything that Trump does.  On the other hand, the democrats want to be tyrants... just their kind of tyrant.

Bingo.

As far as your bold faced lie about paranoia,... [frothing at the mouth deleted]

Do you even know what the word means? Jeezum crow...

https://x.com/overton_news/status/2028116259007582621

I was referring not to the 1973 War Powers Act, but to the root of the issue, namely Article I, Section 8. My point was, lines do need to be drawn, but not while in the middle of a conflict, not in a way that would impede the CiC's ability to exercise his Article II, Section 2 powers.

It appears Trump is acting well within his authority under the WPA.

Liberals are visibly upset that DJT has taken out another one of their beloved dictators.

Who in their right mind professes any love for the Ayatollah? Liberals are upset with ANYTHING Trump does... it's knee-jerk TDS.