Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Are you trying to trigger Anthony now that he knows Kristi Noem is a GMILF? I recall he likes blonds, but probably redheads too.
Personally every redhead I’ve known is batshit crazy.
Probably just sightseeing before the Germans mostly peacefully bombed it.“Nothing is over until WE decide it is.”
The Democrats aren't doing a thing about public opinion, they already have it. They won the election and Republicans have failed to show anything substantial that changes that. All Trump is doing right now is rearranging deck chairs and screwing up how people view him.
A state judge in Pennsylvania is upholding her earlier injunction against the state's certification of the 2020 election results, stating that a lawsuit alleging the unconstitutionality of a state ballot rule is "likel[y] to succeed" on its own merits.
In the ruling Friday nights , Judge Patricia McCullough stipulated that her earlier temporary injunction against the state's elecion certification process was valid and should be enforced.
The lawsuit on which McCullough made the initial injunction argued that the Pennsylvania legislature's Act 77, passed last year, "contravene[d] the requirements of the Pennsylvania Constitution." That act, the petitioners claimed, constituted "an attempt by the legislature to fundamentally overhaul the Pennsylvania voting system and permit universal, no-excuse, mail-in voting absent any constitutional authority," as McCullough summarized the petitioners' argument in her Friday ruling.
The petitioners, McCullough writes in the ruling, "appear to have established a likelihood to succeed on the merits because Petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment."
The Pennsylvania Department of State's office on Tuesday announced that it had certified the presidential and vice presidential election results in Pennsylvania, though McCullough in her ruling noted that there were numerous steps to be taken to officially finalize that certification in state records.
"[T]he emergency preliminary injunction was properly issued," the ruling states, "and should be upheld pending an expedited emergency evidentiary hearing."
Like I've said before, the gentlemanly thing to do was to concede a while ago. No surprise he hasn't.
No. You do both. If there was evidence, they would also be publishing it it to gain support because winning public support is at least as important as winning the court case. There isn’t and that is telling of the outcome of the legal case.
I think in your anger and grief, you’re projecting. It might be more successful of you stopped trying to set up straw men because you don’t like the facts I’m pointing out.
The only case I’ve heard with any merit is the PA procedural case over absentee voting expansion. The PA gov screwed the pooch on this one, but what is the relief?
See how that works? I agree that PA is a mess and probably unable to certify who really won. That is public opinion AND courts.
Damn funny looking turkeys you got there!
(Must be 20,000 calories of protein.)
You're alive Joe, thankfully, so maybe make a New Years Resolution to live a healthier lifestyle? Or not. The beauty is that is YOUR CHOICE. You have probably the best GA plane ever made, so there's that.
I still think it hysterical that you guys regard a little scrap of cloth you put over your face as tyranny. I wouldn't have guessed that in a hundred years. You guys must never have seen the sign "no shirt, no shoes, no service". Those are scraps of cloth too. Tyranny!
1 Like
