1
Spin Zone / Re: The Memo
« on: February 04, 2018, 12:53:16 PM »The memo outlines that Democrats used a political hit piece in order to justify initiating 100% surveillance of a campaign aide. that means that him and everyone that he talked to not only were listened to, but also became targets of the surveillance. The FBI and specifically people with extreme bias against Trump and loyalty to the Democrat party used the FBI's power to listen to everything that was happening in the Republican campaign.
If you're ok with that, then you're also ok with Republicans do the same in the midterms?
Why would I (or anyone else) be in favor of political spying by the FBI?? US Government surveillance of any US citizen is pretty serious stuff. The bar to do so has to be very high. That is the purpose of the FISA court. The government prepares the case and the judge then decides if it is warranted. In this particular case the judge did deem it appropriate. None of us in the general public really has the facts as to why that happened. Could opposition research by a political party be part of that justification? That could be the case, it is up to the FISA judge to evaluate the merits. What the Nunes memo implies is that the only reason the FISA warrant was issued was the Steele documents and was done soley to discredit the President. From what we do know, that doesn't appear to be the case. Other than Mr. Nunes opinion, he gives scant detail to back it up, if Mr. Nunes has true evidence, why didn't he put it in the memo? The surveillance order was renewed multiple times, most recently by people appointed by the current administration. If there was some evidence of illegal activity by the FBI, why was it renewed?
Did the FISA order have limits? Again, that isn't known, we do not know if the surveillance was limited to Page, or included any other contacts he may of had. There is no information that the FBI had the ability to listen in on everything happening in the Republican campaign.