1
Spin Zone / Re: “Angel Flight” for abortion or trans surgeries
« on: March 27, 2024, 06:10:54 PM »Do you mean that if I want to start a social club of White Christian men, it is ok to exclude blacks and Jews and women?Ok with me.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Do you mean that if I want to start a social club of White Christian men, it is ok to exclude blacks and Jews and women?Ok with me.
Does not seem to be associated with regular Angel Flight.The right to associate (or not) with others of like interests seems reasonable to me.
https://www.elevatedaccess.org/
“All of our pilots complete a vetting process to confirm they align with our mission and goals.”
Republicans need not apply!
The majority of stuff posted here should be in green.
I want to buy some but I have no idea how to. I’ve never bought a stock directly.Buying at an IPO is problematic even for seasoned speculators. As a first time buyer of a stock? Have you studied the prospectus? Or just going with a hunch or emotion? DJT is up over 40% from its opening price as I type this. It could go higher, but check the performance of the last 200 IPOs:
Curious what the subsequent commandments are.We’ll never know.
ok, so 4.5 million have doctorates. But a masters degree is also a postgraduate degree.I couldn't get close to his number if I included masters degrees. I did some further searching and found this article:
"The elite 1%—individuals who make over $150,000 a year, live in densely populated areas, and have postgraduate degrees"In 2019 the Census Bureau said ~4.5 million had doctorates[1]. Out of ~300 million that is about 1.5%. That gets in the ballpark. A doctorate in philosophy or other liberal arts degrees is not likely to yield an individual income of $150k. Only ~8% of individuals earn $150k or more[2]. So between that and an appropriately chosen definition for "densely populated area" can yield a number close enough to ~1% for him to be able to say "elite 1%".
I'm questioning how only 1% of our population meets that critiera.
The mindset is that they have wealth to protect, therefore their vote should count more. You and I may not completely agree with that, as it flies in the face of fairness, but they may have a point. If you pay in and participate, you should have a say in how your government is run. After all, do you think a welfare queen should have the same vote as you?That is certainly one possible explanation for their view. I didn't quote the whole linked article, but if you read it the transcript of the interview with Rasmussen includes this exchange:
So the chatter inside the beltway is the dims think they can retake the Speakership before November. Then, they will pass a bill making anyone who is an "insurrectionist" unable to run for President (Trump).Constitution states "...no ex post facto law shall be passed..." so the idea is DOA.
Except their plan is full of flaws. First, the constitution already states the requirements for President. Second, the 14th Amendment already discusses Insurrection and who could be charged and how.
Jamie Ratskin is pushing this nonsense. If they do this, it will go straight to the SC and get tossed.
Dear Jim:Now you know why physicists never get invited to parties.
That was painful.
Love, Becky
Except BILLIONS and BILLIONS in 'redirected' foreign aide...How does that redirected aide help the CIA? Why rule out Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, or China as suspects?
So you're saying it's not within the realm of possibility the U.S. is involved in a clandestine manner in any way? You KNOW this how?No money or power to gain from the chaos.