1876
Spin Zone / Re: Soak The Rich
« on: March 23, 2016, 08:10:03 PM »
I love Stuart Varney.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Fortunately, your lens for examining the Constitution is your own, and not anyone else's, especially anyone who might count like a federal appellate judge. The SCOTUS just unanimously upheld the right to self-defense of a woman who was arrested for carrying a Taser to protect herself. Had they used your lens exclusively, I am sure that the 2nd Amendment would limit our protection to carrying flintlocks. Your view is entirely unworkable, but everyone is entitled to live in their own fantasy world as long as they don't hurt anyone else.
I haven't taken a survey of states that have codified much of common law, but California is one, represented about 12% of the country's population. Not that it would matter, as the Constitution bars using the instruments of state from enforcing the common law as well, when it runs contrary to the Constitution.
It sounds like you're saying we would give Cuba so much money that they would start giving money to Venzuela and other countries? I hope that's not what you're saying.
But again, I suspect they won't have a dictator more than just another couple of years.
It shouldn't come as any surprise that Barack Obama would pose in front of a mural of a communist, mass murdering, terrorist, and talk about agreeing with Castro's hatred of America.
There is no such thing as a constitutional ideologue. Cruz certainly is not one. Scalia wasn't either. Nobody grows up being taught right from wrong based on just the Constitution.Scalia had "reactionary views"? Such as?
Scalia used original intent as the handiest way to support his reactionary views. I actually think that the court needed that input, even though Scalia was hewing true to his Italian Catholic upbringing. That is why we don't just have just one justice. I like that we have liberals on the court too. As long as they all are very, very loath to override previous precedents and make their decisions as narrow as possible.
Oh brilliant!! So, she'll just drop the kid off at the free daycare center and go and take her ignorant ass that barely can make a proper sentence, with no skills whatsoever over to all the local employers that will no doubt be thrilled to have her join their working team.Then you know what? Life is going to suck. At least until such time as they learn this thing called a "work ethic" is something that is needed to exist in this world.
How many ignorant, single moms with poor work habits have you hired? I personally avoid them. Even McDonalds has standards.
The saddest thing about the circular firing squad that is the republican party, is the unavoidable urge to attack anyone that might rock the boat. When every RINO in town, not to mention Mitch McConnell AND John Boehner hate you, you have truly earned my support.
Being born poor is not a life choice.
Tell me something that Cruz has accomplished that might make me respect him, or make me think that he can improve anything in any way.
Has he ever been in charge of anything that was a success? Has he accomplished anything positive?
You guys speak of Trump's "angry white" supporters. Who is any whiter or angrier than Cruz supporters?
Yeah, he talks a good game. He had good grades in college. But what besides the scripted words that come out of his mouth make him any better than Obama?
I'm, willing to listen in case you can show me something I don't know about him.
How about answering the question instead of just a small piece (the only piece that agrees with you, BTW)
December 1979/January 1980
Reagan- 33% Carter-62%
February/March 1980
Reagan- 33% Carter-58%
April/May 1980
Reagan- 32% Carter-40%
June/July 1980
Reagan- 37% Carter-32%
August/September 1980
Reagan- 45% Carter-39%
October/November 1980
Reagan- 47% Carter-44%
ACTUAL RESULTS Reagan- 51% Carter-41%
Move ahead to 1988:
In the early months George HW Bush was trailing Michael Dukakis in April through August by as much as 5 to 16 points behind. It was only in September that GHW Bush took the polling lead to eventually win.
1992:
Clinton was trailing Bush by 19 points in March, 15 points in April and 6 to 10 points in May. In June he was still behind Bush by as much as 10 points. It wasn't until July that Clinton took the lead and eventually won.
2000:
George W Bush and Al Gore actually traded spots back and forth with various polls showing GWB ahead and Al Gore ahead. In the October and November polls GWB enjoyed a lead of 6 to 10 points over Gore in the majority of polls. The polls just before the election showed GWB at 14 points over Al Gore, and the Actual Election result was a 48%/48% split.
So go ahead and hang your hat on the polls right now, March 2016. Historical data has proven that poll wrong time and time again at this time frame.
Spin away.