I notice jaybird NEVER mentions muslim slave owning, slave taking and human trafficking in the current age....

It's always about whitey and his make believe grievances.

I’m not sure what’s more interesting - seeing where slavery exists, or seeing where it doesn’t exist, yet keeps getting blamed for the world’s problems.




https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_21st_century

Appears a long life of crime for this guy. And appears he has been quite mentally ill and angry and takes it out violently on people around him. This attack seems it was a spur of the moment thing after a fight with a girlfriend? No excuse but perhaps an explanation.

Under normal standards of evidence I am not in favor of the death penalty due to the chances of error. However, the evidence is strong enough and beyond the “beyond any possible doubt standard” that I could see the death penalty being appropriate. While I think it is a pity he did not get help earlier in life, at some point if you can’t learn the lesson to control your anger and respect other people’s rights, even denying them the right to life, then I see no reason the rest of society should afford the killer that which he denies others. Theoretical consideration since WI does not have the death penalty.

https://nypost.com/2021/11/25/darrell-brooks-long-life-of-crime-before-waukesha-christmas-parade-attack/

I used to be pro-death penalty, but have changed my view over the last 20 years.  The swamp is too deep - state, federal and municipal - to give any judge or any government that much power to take a life.

Natural Rights and the constitution never seems to have affect on the communist party (democrats).

Absolutely. I seem to recall having a debate years ago (possibly with Steingar but I don’t recall) here or on POA about this. They were adamant that no such rights exist but for their existence in the Bill of Rights.  In other words, it’s the government that grants rights, and we have no such rights if not for the government.

I don’t know how people can get to the point of having such a twisted view of natural rights, yet on the other hand believe the “right” to kill your baby is “enshrined” in the Constitution.

I agree with this sentiment 100%.

https://mobile.twitter.com/FlorioGina/status/1463306250561720331?t=P4XcTro7Bi2R75jkQHq8KA&s=07

Pay attention to the 11:30-12:00 mark if you want to see how we are being manipulated by the “independent media.”

https://youtu.be/kSypu3hOzNo

I didn’t think Lindbergh was in WWII due to the belief I’ve was a Nazi sympathizer. I had to consult Wiki:

In the years before the United States entered World War II, Lindbergh's non-interventionist stance and statements about Jews and race led some to suspect he was a Nazi sympathizer, although Lindbergh never publicly stated support for Nazi Germany and on multiple occasions condemned them in both his public speeches and in his personal diary. However, early on in the war he opposed not only the intervention of the United States but also the provision of aid to the United Kingdom.[5] He supported the antiwar America First Committee and resigned his commission in the U.S. Army Air Forces in April 1941 after President Franklin Roosevelt publicly rebuked him for his views. In September 1941, Lindbergh gave a significant address, titled "Speech on Neutrality", outlining his views and arguments against greater American involvement in the war.[6]

Lindbergh did ultimately express public support for the U.S. war effort after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and the subsequent United States declaration of war upon Germany. He flew 50 missions in the Pacific Theater as a civilian consultant but did not take up arms,[7] as Roosevelt refused to reinstate his Air Corps colonel's commission. In 1954, President Dwight Eisenhower restored his commission and promoted him to brigadier general in the U.S. Air Force Reserve.[8] In his later years, Lindbergh became a prolific author, international explorer, inventor, and environmentalist, eventually dying of lymphoma in 1974 at age 72.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Lindbergh

Not a funny joke actually. How many people have LEOs killed in botched raids in the last year? How many SWAT raids have they executed based on mistaken assumptions? It truly is a very serious problem.

And how many of them have actually been involved in the production of child pornography, where such a question would actually be appropriate.

Read the book “3 Felonies A Day” if you want to start getting a sense of how there are now so many laws that basically any professional is arguably committing several felonies each day. It is mostly a matter of if the prosecutors want to try and get someone.

It wasn’t meant to be a joke. You having problems with LEOs has nothing to do with the immaturity of saying Rittenhouse is a statist. Not all LEOs are bad, just like not all MDs are good.

I bristle when people that I think are sane are using the same tactics as the leftist politicians and MSM to paint Rittenhouse in a broad, vile, and inaccurate brush. You’re doing the same thing, and it’s not becoming of a learned man.

I have sympathy for your plight. I have no sympathy for making insinuations that an 18 year old kid is a statist because he may have wanted to be a police officer some day.

By the way, his lawyer said he hopes to become a nurse some day. Not sure if nurses are statists in your world or not.

Can anyone tell me why this trial, where one white guy shot three white guys in self defense, has anything - anything - to do with race? 

Anyone?  Bueller?  Jaybird?