Which decision specifically? For the abortion law, it was only a matter of time since an almost identical Texas law was struck down several years ago. "Undue burden" is a concept called "the Casey test" and it's an important one. Laws which require so much burden to comply with are illegitimate because they effectively ban what they legislate. If you'd like a more friendly example, consider some state's gun control laws. They could be considered overly burdensome and therefore the laws will be struck down. However the Court has no gotten any such cases recently.
Just because you disagree with someone does not mean you should cancel them, that is what the Left does. We should continue to respect everyone, even "them". Maybe especially them.
Roberts indicates he was a textualist in his confirmation hearings. He is not. He’s an activist in that he is looking at meaning beyond what the legislature wrote.
A justice doesn’t need to consistently vote the “conservative” or “liberal” party line. However, he should vote in the way in which he testified. He has failed that test.
Personally, he should not be a Chief Justice. I think he is playing umpire and calling balls and strikes so that neither party can say he was partisan. He doesn’t want to be excluded from any DC cocktail parties.