31
Spin Zone / Re: Joke Thread: Post 'em if ya got 'em
« on: January 06, 2023, 05:02:53 AM »
.
PILOT SPIN
News:
Welcome to PILOT SPIN!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
32
Spin Zone / Re: 24 Year Old NFL Player Collapses On Field - Stops Breathing
« on: January 03, 2023, 06:21:39 AM »
The word is that this was a heart compression injury from the hit, unrelated to vaccines. Apparently, if you time it just right with the right force, you can cause cardiac arrest. The player's heart was restarted on the field and he is in the hospital in critical condition.
33
Spin Zone / Re: I’m not saying the NYT is antisemitic…
« on: December 19, 2022, 06:14:48 PM »Another take.
https://gab.com/MichelleMalkin/posts/109541053032561918
Sure. The swastika is just a pretty swirl. On the first day of Hanukkah. With clues that say things like boxcars, Brandenburg gate , and “I’m in heaven”.
Ok, we’ll go with denial. Because there’s no “there” there.
34
Spin Zone / Re: I’m not saying the NYT is antisemitic…
« on: December 19, 2022, 03:20:32 PM »
I don’t go looking for things, but the swastika jumped out at me.
35
Spin Zone / I’m not saying the NYT is antisemitic…
« on: December 19, 2022, 10:07:19 AM »
But I will say this is this was their crossword puzzle yesterday, the first day of Hanukkah.
FYI, clue #58 is boxcars.
FYI, clue #58 is boxcars.
36
Spin Zone / Re: “Including the Constitution”
« on: December 06, 2022, 09:44:32 AM »So I’ve read the statement and the follow up response by Trump. No, he was not advocating overthrowing the Constitution.
Not the whole thing, just some parts of it. Whew, that’s a relief.
37
Spin Zone / Re: “Including the Constitution”
« on: December 06, 2022, 07:53:37 AM »Let’s imagine a completely hypothetical scenario, a national election had certified results but later we discover proof of fraud. Sure, some will probably never believe fraud even in the face of incontrovertible proof. But, in this hypothetical, imagine pretty much everyone agrees the certified results were wrong.
What do we do? Ignore the fraud and just accept the fraud who was sworn in?
Have the fraud resign and have the third in line become President?
You prove the fraud and prosecute the people involved.
But there is no Constitutional path for replacing the president. Any attempt will create a constitutional crisis and run you into a wall.
38
Spin Zone / Re: “Including the Constitution”
« on: December 06, 2022, 05:54:35 AM »You're just wrong about what Trump said, that's all. No drama just fact.
How am I wrong? He wrote “allows for termination of…”. Even if you soften it to say “well, he wasn’t suggesting doing it”, he identified termination of parts of the Constitution as a remedy. How the hell can any of you be ok with that? Is your love for the man greater than your love for the Republic?
39
Spin Zone / Re: “Including the Constitution”
« on: December 05, 2022, 01:00:11 PM »The wrong that must be righted is that the Constitution already has been overthrown. Not that he wants to overthrow it.
As well, all this attention on his supposed awful suggestion is bringing out the usual suspects clutching their pearls in horror at the thought of touching the sacred Constitution while mere months ago they were questioning the same Constitution and wanting to do away with it.
Might be, but whatbout-isms aren't useful.
You think I'm clutching my pearls in horror at the thought of touching the sacred Constitution? I don't own any pearls and you wouldn't find me wearing them if I did, but I'm otherwise good with that.
40
Spin Zone / Re: “Including the Constitution”
« on: December 05, 2022, 12:58:07 PM »It just happens that flynn got caught.
caught at...
Correctly parsing English sentences? Reading for context? Supporting the Constitution? Not supporting a right wing former president who suggests terminating parts of the Constitution?
41
Spin Zone / Re: “Including the Constitution”
« on: December 05, 2022, 12:33:27 PM »Today.
Correct, they are. And they're wrong too. What Trump said is that the massive fraud allows for termination of parts of the Constitution.
It should terrify everyone that he said that. If we can terminate parts of the Constitution to make up for a fraudulent election, then why not any part of the Constitution? Not a rhetorical question
42
Spin Zone / Re: “Including the Constitution”
« on: December 05, 2022, 12:31:06 PM »Thank you for answering, what do you think the chances are of anyone paying any consequences except for Musk?
Very low. The bar for govt workers is incredibly low. If you breathe and show up it's nearly impossible to lose your job.
43
Spin Zone / Re: “Including the Constitution”
« on: December 05, 2022, 12:29:54 PM »Exactly. You and Rush nailed it. The Left and their Media are purposely misleading people. Outrage on this but no outrage for unconstitutional gun control laws, health insurance, government over reach and abuse on every level etc.
Who is listening to the Leftist Media? I'm reading his post, which says that someone, presumably The People or their representatives, are allowed to terminate sections of the Constitution, because the fraud puts all that aside.
Tell me how I'm misreading it. It does not say that Fraud means the rules need to to change, it's not a call to action. It's a call to cancel.
44
Spin Zone / Re: “Including the Constitution”
« on: December 05, 2022, 07:21:13 AM »I wonder how bflynn feels about the findings of Elon Musk with regard to Twitter censoring and blocking at the behest of the DNC and Biden campaign? How about the recent emails showing Katie Hobbs requesting posts be taken down from Twitter? What would you call such things?
You don’t have to wonder. It was wrong and those in the govt who pushed for it should be prosecuted for it. There are laws against abuse of power and using your govt authority for personal or political gain.
Slightly worried for Elon that Dems are going to come at him for Twitter’s complicity in all this.
45
Spin Zone / Re: “Including the Constitution”
« on: December 05, 2022, 07:12:39 AM »NO HE DID NOT!!!
Go read what he actually said. He meant that the FRAUD was negating the Constitution. He could have worded it more clearly but it’s obvious what he meant. It is being deliberately misconstrued to hurt him politically.
No. He said there was fraud and that allows us to set aside parts of the Constitution. Here’s the screenshot. Parse the English.