4771
Spin Zone / Re: Melissa v Springsteen
« on: April 10, 2016, 05:42:06 PM »
Springsteen refused to play a concert in North Carolina because he disagreed with a new women's safety law requiring people to use the bathroom of their biological gender. This was in response to a Charlotte city ordinance which was written equally poorly and opened the door for men to legally use a women's restroom.
Why is it "OK" for Springsteen to refuse service because he disagreed with his customer's beliefs but not OK for Sweet Cakes by Melissa to refuse to make a cake for a homosexual wedding because they disagreed with their customer's beliefs?
Why is it "OK" for Springsteen to refuse service because he disagreed with his customer's beliefs but not OK for Sweet Cakes by Melissa to refuse to make a cake for a homosexual wedding because they disagreed with their customer's beliefs?