Yeah, heaven forbid a male actually show some level of testosterone in the current PC, unisex world.  Trump is not exactly who I would have chosen, but at least he understands what it takes to succeed in life's endeavors.  Say what you might about him, but he is a successful man with what it takes to lead.  The doormat on the other hand has accomplished absolutely nothing herself.  Nothing! Being present when others achieve success doesn't count.  She is also devoid of any leadership qualities.  She doesn't inspire. She has no vision. She has no organizational capabilities.  She only conveys that she is entitled, and it's somehow her turn.   We are at a tipping point in this country, and vote for the doormat will ensure the demise of the country as founded. Individual liberty and exceptionalism will be finally, and fully traded for collectivism.   I'm not sure the end result is substantially different with Tump, but at least there is some glimmer of hope with a Trump administration.

This is just another way to remove guns from citizens. This will be fought in the courts and depending on how SCOTUS looks, will hopefully be overturned. The left is hoping that with enough bans that eventually guns will be phased out of the common person's hands. Criminals, the "connected", and our governmental overlords, of course, will still have plenty of them.

The term "liberal" goes back to the founding of our country.  Then liberal meant the concept of freedom for the individual.  It become more of a political definition in the 20th century.  Rush Limbaugh has been working for three decades to turn it into an insult, at which point it lost its definitional underpinnings.  I am a classic, 18th Century liberal.

Progressive seemed to be a term I have heard applied to the turn of the century worker's rights movements.  Teddy Roosevelt was one of its champions.  It seems to be largely interchangeable these days with the label "liberal" though a lot of leftists seem to prefer it to "liberal" as the latter has been so demonized in some circles.

So after reading this, are we to assume that the university the perfesser works at doesn't require staff or students to have a photo ID as well?

 Wouldn't that be unfair as well?

Seriously??? This is your response? What a load of bull crap. They have buses and every poor person in the world knows how to use them. You could ride one too when it's too chilly outside. One day killed, to get an ID out of all the rest of the days of one's life, is too much of a hardship?? You have got to be shitting me!

It would appear that it was somewhat less than effective.