He engages in propaganda - anyone who has watched his shows realizes that. Just because propagandists dig for and present dirt, er, facts, doesn't make them unbiased and thus journalists. I may agree with the goals of some propagandist but they are still what they are.I never said I didn't like the interview taking place. I simply indicated that an ideal journalist would have also tried to interview Zelensky. But Carlson will likely not because he long ago indicated who he considers the worse side even before the secondary invasion of Ukraine:
https://www.businessinsider.com/tucker-carlson-asks-why-us-should-side-ukraine-over-russia-2022-1
Carlson has a specific opinion on Ukraine vs Russia and is acting to promote it. I consider it naive at best to label those actions as journalism in its most noble meaning.
So what was propaganda during the interview? What did Carlson say or do that would constitute propaganda?
As far as your claim Carlson hasn't tried to interview Zelenskyy, how do you know this? I believe it's the other way around, Zelenskyy would be ducking an interview attempt by Carlson.
Why? Because Zelenskyy would be asked some tough questions by Carlson rather than the glowing softball crap the MSM does with him.
You don't want to accept that Zelenskyy is nothing more than a dictator, and you want the establishment version that he's somehow this saintly leader fighting for democracy. You can't seem to accept on many levels Zelenskyy is on par with Putin.
From what I'm gathering you are butthurt that Americans got a glimpse of the other side without editing and censorship. You are echoing the exact same crap the leftist are crying about. The more I read of your positions you seem quite happy to have censorship and a controlled narrative.
As far as your definition of journalism, the medium has shifted since those definitions came around. Instead of just print, we now have audio, video and other electronic means of journalism.
But since you demand we stick to the strictest meaning of a word, do you consider yourself to be gay? After all, for many many years if a person was gay that meant they were very happy. You are gay aren't you?