The President and the head of the Democrat Party, Nancy Pelosi, are arguing extensively over allowing immigrants into our country.

Nancy, of course, wants free access to everyone who wants to come in, while Donald wants us to secure our borders and ensure only the right people come in.

Instead of going to a costly, time-consuming nationwide vote on the matter, they agree to a 3-day ice fishing contest to settle the issue whoever catches the most fish at the end of the 3 days will have his or her process implemented.

The two decide that a remote frozen lake in northern Wisconsin would be the ideal place. No observers on the fishing grounds, but both would need to have their catches verified and counted each night at 5 PM so they use a neutral park ranger station.

After Day 1, Trump returns to the station with a total of 10 fish, while Pelosi comes back with nothing.

Day 2 finishes and Trump catches another 20 fish, but Pelosi once again comes back with nothing.

That night, Pelosi and her liberal cronies get together and accuse Trump of being a “low-life, cheating piece of scum.”

Instead of fishing on Day 3, they are going to follow Trump and to spy on him and figure out how he is cheating.

Day 3 finishes up and Trump has had an incredible day, adding 40 more to his total.

That night, Pelosi and her democratic cohorts get together for the full report on how Donald was cheating.

Pelosi stands up to give her report and says, “You are not going to believe this. Trump is cheating because he’s cutting holes in the ice.”

And this, my friends, tells you the difference between a businessman and a career government politician

You mean these guys just can't take one out for a $100,000 hamburger run or something?

https://vtdigger.org/2018/11/26/flying-fraternity-guard-commanders-wings-clipped-secret-rendezvous/

Here is why we can not have discussions here

We have discussions here daily.  Are you mistaking this site for PoA?

I would guess 99% of the people here agree with this.
I would guess maybe 50% would agree with this
Read the bold part, a lot would agree with that too.
Again he is backing our guy.

So what do we do here? Most people just start bashing Steingar on a personal level.

 OK, what did I write in my reply to the perfesser that was "bashing" as you put it?

 I simply questioned his post, and corrected him using the actual constitution, not the perceived one of the left.  Making an absurd statement that a President could face impeachment for exercising his powers under the constitution is well, absurd.

At least we'll have continuity with Ryan leaving and Pelosi taking over.........You won't notice much difference.