15706
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Those who knew what was in the memo (DoJ, FBI, members of Congress) yet wet their panties that disclosure of the memo would compromise national security, expose sources and methods, and other things that could literally get people killed, should be publicly and forcefully admonished for lying the the American people, as we now all know that nothing in the memo said any such things, and that their tantrums were solely related to preventing embarrassment of themselves or the DoJ or the FBI.
Why would I (or anyone else) be in favor of political spying by the FBI?? US Government surveillance of any US citizen is pretty serious stuff. The bar to do so has to be very high. That is the purpose of the FISA court. The government prepares the case and the judge then decides if it is warranted. In this particular case the judge did deem it appropriate.
None of us in the general public really has the facts as to why that happened. Could opposition research by a political party be part of that justification? That could be the case, it is up to the FISA judge to evaluate the merits.
What the Nunes memo implies is that the only reason the FISA warrant was issued was the Steele documents and was done soley to discredit the President. From what we do know, that doesn't appear to be the case. Other than Mr. Nunes opinion, he gives scant detail to back it up, if Mr. Nunes has true evidence, why didn't he put it in the memo?
The surveillance order was renewed multiple times, most recently by people appointed by the current administration. If there was some evidence of illegal activity by the FBI, why was it renewed?
Did the FISA order have limits? Again, that isn't known, we do not know if the surveillance was limited to Page, or included any other contacts he may of had. There is no information that the FBI had the ability to listen in on everything happening in the Republican campaign.
I read it and was expecting much more from Nunes. Much more. Game changing stuff.
Instead, it may be the tip of the iceberg, or it may be an ice cube.
I think Trump should fire The AG, nominate Gowdy as AG, and indict that smirk right off of Comey’s face.
James Comey summed up the Nunes memo the best - “That’s it!??”
The key point of the Nunes memo is that the FBI used the Steele documents without informing the FISA court that they were prepared by a political party and the veracity of the documents was in doubt. Nunes provides no evidence of this other than his opinion, Nunes did not even look at the underlying data,
Without actually seeing the FISA application and the discussions that went into granting it, it is impossible to tell if this claim of “bias” is true or not or whether the surveillance would have been granted in any case. I have no idea if the rules of a FISA application allows for the use of information that has a political bias or is otherwise un-verified. It does seem that the Steele documents were not the sole basis for granting the FISA surveillance, but even that is unproven. Lacking some hard evidence that the FBI did something illegal or woefully un-ethical, the Nunes memo is short on fact and long on speculation.
So, let’s see it all, the Democratic response, the FISA application (properly redacted) and the full transcripts of the proceedings.
The $64,000 question in American politics today is this: will President Trump be impeached and removed from office? The short answer to this question is: very likely not. Nonetheless, there are a variety of ways in which the impeachment drama could play out. It could end with a whimper or a bang. To a large degree, this is in special counsel Robert Mueller's hands.
Where's General Session's statement? He owns this.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions said Friday that he will push the Justice Department to clean up any shortcomings identified in the wake of the new House intelligence committee memo, saying “no department is perfect.”
Mr. Sessions, in a statement, did not say whether he agreed with the conclusions in the memo, which argues top FBI and Justice Department officials during the Obama administration, bleeding into the Trump administration, used tainted evidence to justify spying on a Trump campaign figure.
Instead, Mr. Sessions said Congress’s questions are legitimate and must be answered.