This solution predicated on a supposition that we have an epidemic of people having babies for welfare benefits. I'd like your data on that, please.

Whether they have them for welfare benefits or whether they have them then need welfare really doesn't matter.  The point is if they can't afford the consequences they shouldn't be putting themselves in the position  where they can get pregnant.   Personal responsibility.

However, you seem to be forgetting Trumps exhortations to his followers to beat the crap out of people and such.


He thinks that rhetoric causes violence for Geller, but not for him.  That's hypocricy, but pretty much par for the course for Trump.

Oh come on, exhortations to violence? Have we all become pussies?   The closest he came was with the tomato comment and "knock the hell out  of them".   These guys are going to these rallies to cause trouble, then they cry like little pussies for the press when they get whacked back.  I just watched a video of a fat guy who claimed he was being attacked, every time he got up he'd go for someone swinging, he got we he begged for, then he acts like a martyr in front of the cameras.

Says a lot doesn't it.  He's not going anywhere.  At least that's something.

He doesn't need to go far, just enough to dilute the vote.

The point is, why tax businesses at all?  It just gets passed right on to the consumer.

I get that, but people are too stupid to understand that.

Original post struck out as in poor taste.  I take full responsibility for my insensitivity, and as such will not try and flush my insensitivity down the memory hole by deleting it altogether.

Ah, just flush it, we all screw up, part of being human.

When he says "I will do this" and "I will do that" he implies that he's going to go alone if necessary, same as Obama. I could be wrong. I hope I am.

But lies, Paul?  Why don't you tell me the truth about Trump. What do we know about him except his wall will be beautiful and his support is HUGE?  He certainly hasn't told us how he's going to do things in his debates and speeches.

And the facts we DO KNOW point to his very recent background as a democrat and supporting liberal causes. That's what we know. Now he's made a constant rate 180 degree turn, and we should believe he's a conservative?

That's what I'm looking for, those facts of which you speak. The facts that support as you say his support, up until recently, of liberal causes, I don't see that when I really look.  Yes he has contributed to democrats when it benefited his business, part of the reason he has been so successful.  But from what I see, when I weed out the hatchet job that is being done him by both the DNC and RNC, I see a guy who has pretty much always claimed to be a republican and relatively conservative.   

Help me out here.   I prefer Cruz, right now anyway, but the more I look at Trump, the more I like him.  Furthermore, he will be a force to be reckoned with should he get in, not like the pansy assed losers like McCain and McConnell or, unfortunately Ryan.