There you go.  The next step is in June when he will install the titanium screw.  Then it heals some more and he will cap it in the fall. The whole process will take a year.

Just out of curiosity, which way do you think is the correct order of brushing and flossing?  To my surprise, my dentist and hygienist said you should actually floss before you brush.  If you brush first, you brush right over the crud.

I don’t “think” brushing first is the right way, I know it is.  It’s the way my mother did it and the way all my dentists except one have done it. (That one was wrong.)

2: Clean between your teeth

It might sound backward, but yes, you’re supposed to floss before you brush your teeth. As Wadia explains, a toothbrush (even when used effectively) can only reach the front and back sides of teeth. Flossing after you brush is certainly better than not flossing at all — she likens no flossing at all to only cleaning one side of a dirty dish and putting it back in the cupboard. That said, it’s best if the floss comes first “so that when you do brush your teeth, the toothpaste can have good access in between the teeth,” says Wadia.

And no intelligent adult would ever think you were either conservative or republican.

shouldn't that be FcP?

"Muslim immigrants are openly calling for "Death to America" IN OUR OWN CITIES.  The regime is openly allowing this,"

It has been my understanding of English that the pronoun "this" refers to something appearing earlier in the text, not later (unless followed by a colon.) And the placement of the comma indicated the completion of the sub-thought. Over the years you have demonstrated, to me at least, that you can articulate your positions very well with little or no ambiguity. I found it striking that you would write something suggesting suppression of free speech, hence the pointed question.

Thank you for the correction.

Next we will hear how unqualified JD Vance is to have an opinion............. 

https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1779580973862031501

JD Vance says what we all feel.

No more aid for Ukraine.

They can't win the war.

Supreme Court to weigh if Jan. 6 rioters can be charged with obstruction

Defense lawyers say prosecutors improperly stretched the law by charging hundreds with obstruction of an official proceeding

In the aftermath of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, federal prosecutors had to decide what charges to bring against hundreds of participants in the pro-Trump mob that disrupted the certification of a presidential election for the first time in U.S. history.

In more than 350 cases, they included a federal charge that carries a hefty 20-year maximum penalty and is part of a law enacted after the exposure of massive fraud and shredding of documents during the collapse of the energy giant Enron.

As of this month, more than 100 rioters have been convicted and sentenced under that statute for obstructing or impeding an official proceeding — in this case the joint session of Congress that convened on Jan. 6 to formally certify Joe Biden’s 2020 victory.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments about whether prosecutors improperly stretched the law by charging people with that violation in the first place.

The court’s decision could have political implications for this year’s election, since Donald Trump — the likely Republican nominee — has made accusations of prosecutorial overreach a core part of his appeal to voters. The case could also directly impact Trump’s own trial for allegedly trying to remain in power after his 2020 defeat; two of the four charges he faces are based on the obstruction statute, and he could move to have those charges dismissed if the Supreme Court rules for the rioters.

There is something wonky about that scope.
I agree.

Is it a staged photo-op?