How does this sentence make sense?
The ONS also found that there have been more deaths due to COVID-19 than flu in every year since 1929. They noted that 73,766 deaths in 2020 were due to COVID-19, and 67,258 in 2021, while there were 73,212 deaths due to flu in 1929.You just said there have been more Covid deaths than flu deaths every year since 1929 and in the same sentence you said there were 67,258 Covid deaths in 2021 as opposed to 73,212 flu deaths in 1929.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/covid-19-deaths-have-outpaced-deaths-from-pneumonia-and-flu#COVID-19,-pneumonia,-and-fluAnd another thing:
“Perhaps a better way of comprehending the impact of COVID-19 is to look at total excess deaths,” noted Dr. Cutler, “These are the number of deaths over and above the number anticipated by historical averages. During the past 2 years, the World Health Organization puts this number at 15 million.”
“This is in contrast to the 6 million worldwide deaths currently attributed by individual countries to COVID-19. But even these large numbers do not give a full picture of the impact of COVID-19 and why we need to all take action to reduce the number of infections, serious illnesses as well as deaths,” he added.So if there are 15 million excess deaths and only 6 million of those are Covid, what caused the other 9 million excess deaths? Might it have been lockdowns? Suicide? Other diseases from a weakened immune system? Riots and rising crime? Fearmongering keeping people from going to the ER when they have chest pain? So why are you saying we need to “take action to reduce the number of infections”? I’m sure you mean more lockdowns, masking and vaccines. But…. Logic implies those are the very things causing the 9 million extra deaths.
Think about it. The number of excess deaths
not due to Covid is 33% again greater than the number of deaths caused by Covid itself. Seems pretty clear the cure is worse than the disease.