Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Rush

Pages: 1 ... 809 810 [811] 812 813 ... 816
12151
Spin Zone / Re: Those Oh So Tolerant Liberals
« on: February 04, 2017, 10:38:35 AM »
Now look at what is happening to the Democrat party.  If anything but the radical left exists in that party, I can't see it.  THEY are on the slide to irrelevancy.

Agree with your whole post.  I don't know about the politicians but I've been watching a lot of youtube videos where ordinary people voice their opinions.  There are certain groups of people that are swinging Republican, or at least leaving the Democrat party.  Many are religious Democrats.  Like the old black man who's been a Democrat his whole life but is very homophobic and is appalled by the radical gay agenda embraced by the Democrats, and deeply religious Catholics, who have been loyal Democrats since Kennedy, now see the Democrat party becoming completely amoral.  Same with Protestant working class in the south and the rust belt.  These demographics might not be there yet in a statistical majority (in the case of blacks it is still far from that) but the sentiment seems to be taking root.  The Democrat party has gone too far into looneyland and the majority of Americans are not extremists.

12152
Spin Zone / Re: Those Oh So Tolerant Liberals
« on: February 04, 2017, 10:25:18 AM »
Tucker Carlson is really impressing me with how he is handling his show. His interviews are long, he doesn't talk over his guests, he tried to force them to answer the questions.

O'Reilly and Hannity are unwatchable, but I record and watch Tucker.

I love Hannity's radio show but I agree with you about these two TV shows. I've stopped watching both of them, the sole reason being they never let a guest finish a thought before walking all over them.

12153
Spin Zone / The working class
« on: February 01, 2017, 12:41:22 PM »

12154
Spin Zone / Re: Hypocrisy
« on: January 31, 2017, 10:19:28 AM »
If you get them young enough sometimes you can fix them.  I'm working on my niece and I suspect I'm the reason she doesn't outright claim to be liberal.  I'm not inundating her with right wing stuff, that doesn't work because those sources can be just as shrill and biased. I'm encouraging her to go to ALL sources on both sides and to use her own critical thinking skills to sort out truth from fiction. The facts are there but you have to go beyond getting all your news from the facebook feed and mainstream media.

But it's a job, you have to undo 12 years of public school indoctrination and then 4 years of university brainwashing.  But if as in the case of my niece, she has not really been interested in politics at all until now, she's a clean slate other than the rhetoric that's been pounded into her. She has not engaged in a lot of deep rationalization yet.

But when they get old, like my brother, they've spent a lifetime building a strong rationalized structure of thought, all based on false foundations, but now set like concrete.  I don't hold out any hope I'd ever be able to change him now, even without the wife.

Just like the false foundation of what you said Little Joe.  The falsehood that males are somehow keeping females oppressed in this country.  There is no wage discrimination.  If there were, all employers would hire only women, because they'd be getting a deal.  The payment disparity is because women are less productive and a higher risk to hire, because they still quit when they have babies, or take more time off.

I can't speak to how things were before I was born (mid 50s) but in my lifetime I have experienced exactly zero gender discrimination.  I had a great career in a male dominated field (engineering).   I've always been able to do anything I want, even in male dominated activities, like fly airplanes and shoot guns.  I can also do female dominated things like sewing and baking, without the stigma of being an effeminate fruit.  I perceive my world and opportunities to be much greater and more free than men's. 

I have been able to work full time when I chose, and then quit and live off my husband when I chose.  For the price of what?  Having to keep the house reasonably clean for him?  Cook a dinner most nights?  Women call THAT being oppressed?  It's NOTHING compared to what men go through daily to provide for us.  And lets talk about men.  The most dangerous and boring jobs go to males almost exclusively.  Garbage pickup. Construction, soldiering in combat.  By the way, why on earth women are screaming "sex discrimination" because they aren't allowed to go into combat is beyond me. Be careful what you wish for bitches. We are going to see the day drafting for combat includes women. Thanks a lot. Yeah I was really jealous of those guys registering for the draft during the Vietnam war. ::)

For me, I'm happy to let the big strong men be warriors for me. Although if you're a diesel dyke and wish to have the exact same job as a man, I feel you should as long as you can pass the same physical strength standards.  I don't believe in lowering standards just to let in women.  But I also don't believe in discrimination so if you are female and can pass the standards, you should be let in.

But such women are not the ones with whom I have a problem. I have a problem with the precious little whiny clueless spoiled brats who demand that standards be adjusted for them.  The young females protesting for "women's rights" in America today have reached a level of narcissistic self absorption I thought possible only in the most warped personality disorder, a level of deep ignorance and lack of insight that is beyond belief.  A sense of entitlement far worse than any spoiled princess in any fairy tale.

But back to my point, THIS is an example of a false belief my brother apparently holds as a foundation for his liberalism - believing somehow that in America today females are still oppressed.  How much does a person have to twist and warp their brain to believe this?  How much must you deliberately shut your eyes to reality in front of you to believe like this?  People like this actually believe that because Hillary lost the EC she did so because she's female and we are still oppressing women. Are you kidding me?  Hillary reached heights of power and influence of which the great majority of males in this country couldn't even dream.

These snowflakes are crying and whining over poor Hillary having been oppressed by not being elected and what do they feel for the LITERALLY poor male without a job who voted for Trump - absolute contempt.   If giving women the vote led to this kind of spoiled rotten confused priorities, we never should have done it.

12155
Spin Zone / Re: Hypocrisy
« on: January 30, 2017, 08:53:55 PM »
On a kind of sad note, my 17 year old grand daughter has apparently gone snow flake.  She unfriended me on FB.

Not a grand daughter!  Awwwww.   :'(   My niece claims to be independent, voted third party (probably Stein) but everything she "likes" on FB is of the wacko left.  I had to unfollow my brother and sister in law because they both kept spamming hate filled leftist crap but I would never unfriend family.  You can unfollow without unfriending. My brother and I came close though, this election cycle. He's a 50 year old "snowflake".  Ex Marine.... HOW?????   Because he married a liberal Brit I guess. Has to believe like the wife says. At least he's still pro second amendment. That much Marine stayed in him. He and I have agreed to not talk about politics for the sake of family peace.  My brother and I cannot communicate through FB. That place is evil. We've gone to texting and occasional phone calls, keeping the subjects entirely "sterile".

I hope your grand daughter comes around.

12156
Spin Zone / Re: Are liberals right? No significant voting fraud?
« on: January 28, 2017, 09:39:02 AM »

Not only do I see nothing wrong with people not wanting to vote, I wish people weren't hounded or urged to vote for the sake of voting. It generates random noise at best, an emotion-driven choice at worst.

You can't eliminate the emotion driven choice although I agree it's not a good one. But there might be reasons it's appropriate.  Stay with me here, understand I think Obama is the single worst president we have ever had.  I talked to several blacks about why they voted him in and got answers that were 100% about the first black president.  When I pushed for thoughts about issues and policy, they had nothing to say.  The more conservative ones did not disagree that fiscal progressivism is bad, but that didn't matter, just the fact that a black is voted into the White House will "heal" the racial divide blah blah blah blah.  Of course, these are purely racist motives because they voted on skin color alone.  Nevermind the irony, hypocrisy, etc., this was an emotional vote, and if I step into their shoes and look at it from their perspective, I can understand where they're coming from. 

The Trump win also was driven largely by emotion.  People who have lost jobs, had their quality of life decline for the first time in U.S. history, and are losing their dreams for a future, voted for Trump out of desperation. They did something outrageous, like Spock jettisoning and igniting the shuttle craft fuel.  The risk is if you're wrong, you crash back on the planet.  But at this point what have you got to lose?  You're going to die anyway. 

In fact, the following pretty much nails my own state of mind when I pulled the lever for Trump:

KIRK: Mister Spock.
SPOCK: Captain.
KIRK: There's really something I don't understand about all of this. Maybe you can explain it to me. Logically, of course. When you jettisoned the fuel and ignited it, you knew there was virtually no chance of it being seen, yet you did it anyhow. That would seem to me to be an act of desperation.
SPOCK: Quite correct, Captain.
KIRK: Now we all know, and I'm sure the doctor will agree with me, that desperation is a highly emotional state of mind. How does your well-known logic explain that?
SPOCK: Quite simply, Captain. I examined the problem from all angles, and it was plainly hopeless. Logic informed me that under the circumstances, the only possible action would have to be one of desperation. Logical decision, logically arrived at.
KIRK: I see. You mean you reasoned that it was time for an emotional outburst.
SPOCK: Well, I wouldn't put it in exactly those terms, Captain, but those are essentially the facts.
KIRK: You're not going to admit that for the first time in your life, you committed a purely human emotional act?
SPOCK: No, sir.
KIRK: Mister Spock, you're a stubborn man.
SPOCK: Yes, sir.


12157
Spin Zone / Re: Are liberals right? No significant voting fraud?
« on: January 27, 2017, 12:14:09 PM »
I would think that liberals that honestly believe voter fraud is minuscule would get behind this to prove their point.  Only if someone thinks that they have something to hide would they resist.

I thought liberals were all about looking for voter fraud. Wasn't that why Jill Stein did all the recounts in the blue belt states?  If they were behind that, shouldn't they be all for what Trump's doing?

12158
Spin Zone / Re: Are liberals right? No significant voting fraud?
« on: January 27, 2017, 10:07:36 AM »
Voting records are generally public data. We could already find out whether people voted in two states.

Crossed with my post.  Yes, but are we doing this?  Has anyone made up an EDI for all the states, imported the data and written a query looking for this?  I'd be surprised.

12159
Spin Zone / Re: Are liberals right? No significant voting fraud?
« on: January 27, 2017, 10:05:27 AM »
I'm alright with the investigation as long as the results are published fairly no matter the outcome. I do think it's important to note that being registered to vote in two states is not illegal, something that Mr. Bannon knows to be true since he did it. Our voter rolls are garbage, so there is no efficient system to do something as simple as remove voters from the roll once they move to another location. If we had a modern opt-out system with information sharing, that might be different.

This seems to be true.  I was in the process of moving to Texas during the primaries last year.  I ended up voting in the NC primary.  When I got to Texas I registered in Texas.  Then I got a ballot in the mail from NC because they were doing a runoff or a re-vote or something.  I was to fill it out and mail it back.  I called the election board in NC and told them my primary residence is now Texas and I should be removed from the NC voter rolls.  She did so and asked me to just tear up the ballot.

As far as I know, if I had not called and asked to be removed, my name would still be on the rolls.  There would be nothing stopping me from voting early in Texas, then flying back to NC and voting.  Or if I didn't, somebody else impersonating me and voting under my name.  As far as I know, the states do not compare databases to look for this sort of thing.



12160
Spin Zone / Re: At core, what is a liberal?
« on: January 24, 2017, 06:57:28 AM »
I clicked on here thinking you'd be soliciting answers.

Actually I am.  I don't agree with everything this guy says.  I think he nails the fundamentals, such as the expectation that we all should have equally good outcomes and that this is even possible, but without critical analysis of how we're supposed to achieve that. 

Liberalism used to at least have a vision of some future utopia, and today it's based on nothing more than, "If it's America, it's evil.  If it's successful, it's evil (unless it's in the entertainment industry). If it's Western Civilization, it's evil. If it's Christian (or Judaism), it's evil. If it's white straight male, it's evil. If it's fossil fuel energy, it's evil," and so on, because these ideas are now woven into the culture so tightly the younger generations don't even question it, like the fish doesn't question the water.

I was a liberal as a young person when the vision was there.  I still am on many social issues. But when it came to wealth redistribution and economic collectivism, I questioned the logic of how this would actually work in the real world. No liberal could give me a convincing description of how it could end in anything but failure.  To this day they can't.  I always had trouble understanding why they cling to those beliefs despite this, but this video somewhat explains why. 

So maybe I'm soliciting thoughts on that. If you're a liberal and you believe for example, money should be taken from those who earn it and given to those who don't, how do you reconcile that with the natural human tendency to then stop working if what you earn is taken from you, and to stop working if support is just given to you?  The whole of society's productivity declines because incentive is taken away.  How do you NOT see that?  The answer in this video is, because you're brainwashed from the age of 5 to not think too hard about it.  I guess I'm wondering if you agree with that, or if not, what's your alternative explanation?

12161
Spin Zone / At core, what is a liberal?
« on: January 23, 2017, 09:20:05 PM »
This is a fascinating listen, if you can get past the first couple of minutes.  Gets down to the bedrock of modern liberalism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c

12162
Spin Zone / Re: Good guy with a gun
« on: January 23, 2017, 04:43:18 PM »
TWO good guys with guns.  Too bad one of them was fatally wounded.  But YAY for my fellow gun loving Texans.  We were in San Antonio yesterday, though not near that mall.  We went to see the Alamo.

I love stories like this; citizens standing up to criminal scum. 

12163
Spin Zone / Re: The Return of Camelot
« on: January 23, 2017, 09:27:04 AM »
Agree also.  I voted against Trump in the primary. Even now from my posts you can see my reservations about him.  But I sure voted for him against Hillary and I'm thrilled he beat her. That doesn't make me a robotic devotee.

12164
Spin Zone / Re: I'm still wondering ....
« on: January 23, 2017, 09:18:37 AM »
When you allow yourself to hear opinions outside the echo chamber of stupidity that is the left, you discover that people who ACTUALLY know Donald Trump say he is far more comfortable talking to bricklayers and painters than he is bankers and stock brokers, because he spent his life actually working around construction projects, instead of going to dinners and talking about who actually work for a living.

As for doing what he talked about: New Trump White House Website Sets Agenda That Mirrors Campaign Pledges

Revised website features issue pages for energy policy, foreign policy, economic policy, expanding the military, bolstering law enforcement and rethinking trade

http://www.wsj.com/articles/new-trump-white-house-website-sets-agenda-that-mirrors-campaign-pledges-1484956089

Instead of embarking on an apology tour and picking up an empty Nobel prize, like the fucking dog, Obama, Trump seems to be actually working. What a shock. A working guy that works, instead of a fucking pansy that talks.

Yes and this is why I have hope.  I'm loving this.

12165
Spin Zone / Re: I'm still wondering ....
« on: January 23, 2017, 07:53:59 AM »
I'm hoping Trump doesn't turn out to be just another elite insider.  The fact that he's a billionaire while talking about the rich elite ignoring the rest of us non-billionaires is, of course, not lost on me.  So either he's going to screw the rest of us and buddy up with the Democrat (and Republican) insiders, or he's going to actually fulfill his promises to not ignore us anymore.  Still cautiously optimistic.  Hillary had already proven who she was; with Trump we've at least got a chance.

Pages: 1 ... 809 810 [811] 812 813 ... 816