So all positions are equally valid.  My position is that you're stupid and need to shut up.  Good with that?

If both positions are running the same thought to the same conclusion then they would be equally valid.

Subjective policy applied via whims of the policy creator works both ways so any position taken using the OP's "Tax x group for what they use/want" formula would be valid.

So not all positions are equally valid but all positions derived from the same ruleset would logically have to be.

While it appeals to the republican party bases desire for "fairness" such rhetoric is easily flipped and applied back so while an entertaining thought not very much use beyond  feeling like you "owned the libs/repubs".

I think its a bit archaic to say gaming is bad/nerdy/basement dweller type of hobby nowadays.   Its more competitive, complex and accessible than almost any other hobby or sport. There are people who take it too far like any hobby but for most of us we are just having fun hoping you'll join us but if not thats cool too.   

Kinda clickbaity article from breitbart. Someone wrote an article outlining ways to remove trump one of those is a coup.

Of course she said"or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders". Then spends a few paragraphs not talking about a coup but civilian control of military and the culture of non partisanship

she ends with
 " The prospect of American military leaders responding to a presidential order with open defiance is frightening — but so, too, is the prospect of military obedience to an insane order. After all, military officers swear to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, not the president. For the first time in my life, I can imagine plausible scenarios in which senior military officials might simply tell the president: “No, sir. We’re not doing that,”

Not so sure where we are supposed to be outraged.