I would also probably consider this to be a piece of disinformation. More specifically where it says that myocarditis is “a common and potentially deadly side effect” of vaccination.

The rate of this is like on the order of 1-10 per million, which is hardly in the ballpark of “common”

Also, the most likely myocarditis in young males is not deadly.

Nonetheless, I think it a very poor idea to have people with no medical training trying to make these determinations.

Solution is - don’t use PoA and invite people on blocked threads to come over to PS via PM.

If you mention this place on POA you get deleted and banned.

Best to mention to people in private messages on PoA. While the management council members may read some private messages, they are less likely to ban you for them. This is likely an effective tactics for threads that get locked, like the one in the OP.

PoA moderation was, IMHO, operating subjectively at least from 2008{*}, though posters then had an outlet in their pilotspin subforum. The subjectivity progressed over the years as their rules grew and grew and grew. In addition the successor of a moderator is chosen by other moderators, so divergence from the user base was inevitable.

{*} I say 2008 because I believe that is when I created an account on PoA after aviation author Bob Gardner (RIP) left Usenet rec.aviation.piloting newgroup that year with this announcement:
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.aviation.piloting/c/vKZQkSU3Huw/m/foUVB0wmbBoJ

I guess these sort of forums do age. And with the successors being chosen by successors the drift seems inevitable.

While there is always some amount of subjectivity in enforcing even objectively defined rules, they now propose to enforce explicitly subjective rules which they base on being able to judge the states of mind of posters. I was shocked to learn of that and that is when I decided to largely stop contributing there. I don’t think anyone is particularly good at mind reading.

It was a government daily data report.  The people pushing the false "vaccines are deadly" narrative cherry picked two numbers from the report and produced a lie.

Strikes me as worse than cherry-picking, which is normally using a subset of the data. In this case they completely mis-interpreted the data. It is as though they simply don’t understand the difference between a rate of something occurring and the raw number of occurrences. This level of mathematical illiteracy does not surprise me at naturalnews at all.

As has U-Haul.

Thanks, I would also rather see PS performance improved, and am willing to contribute the funds necessary.

These are good questions to try and debug the situation. I will track for the next week what appears to be happening, perhaps at a few locations and on a few devices and then provide a more detailed report.

I note that I just now waited over a minute for this reply to page to load.

Moved discussion of this issue over to a new thread in the Forum Feedback and Tutorials sub-forum. The problem still seems to persist.

http://www.pilotspin.com/index.php?topic=6130.0

Typical story of anti-competitive behavior by large established companies using the law to try and squelch competition - https://aeroxplorer.com/articles/how-southwest-took-over-dallas-love-field-airport.php