Why does Trump take Xanax?

To cope with Hispanic attacks.


Sent from my iPhone . Squirrel!!

Didn't see El Chapo mentioned in any of the linked articles.

 I didn't say or imply there was.

Didn't see any illegal contributions or did I miss some?

 No one said or implied they were.

  Was there any pay to play?  I don't know.  Can you prove any?

 Who brought up pay to play?  Oh, you did.  Can you prove there wasn't any?

Anybody can "question" anything but can they prove anything?

 If proof was offered you would just say it really didn't happen. Or blame the Russians.

Did the Clinton's profit from contributions to their charitable foundation?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/10/27/memo-shows-bill-clintons-wealth-tied-clinton-foundation/92842822/

http://www.wnd.com/2016/09/hold-on-clintons-dont-benefit-from-foundation/

http://www.wnd.com/2016/11/clinton-foundation-paid-for-chelseas-wedding/

 But of course, please tell us it's all fake news by the Russians.

 

Soros loses a Billion dollars.   

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/billionaire-george-soros-reportedly-lost-134916493.html

Further, no presidents release their college transcripts.

If you're a Republican, like GWB, some leftist releases them for you to a compliant media outlet that dutifully published them. 



It is in many ways similar to Obama's first (only!) Senate campaign -- when his Republican opponent Jack Ryan was forced to withdraw after Ryan's sealed divorce court records somehow were made public, exposing his ex-wife's allegations of sex club visits.  Funny how those "inadvertent" disclosures so frequently seem to benefit Democrats at the expense of Republicans, isn't it?  O_o  But I digress...

Ace, you and I have been over this ground before -- Let's be honest.  It is known fact that at one point in his career, that Obama (or those working on his behalf) touted him as "born in Kenya... raised in Indonesia and  Hawaii" (whether that was entirely factual or not).  Some will attribute that to Obama, even if he was not directly responsible, since it was incontrovertibly said about him and on his behalf to promote his early writing engagements. 

The interest in Obama's (Columbia) college records are not his grades, but that they would show that he claimed to be a foreign student (perhaps "born in Kenya" -- has a nice ring to it, eh?) in order to gain transfer admission from Occidental.   

Like the birth certificate, the significance is (was) not that Obama was actually born in Hawaii vs. Kenya.  In either case he is undoubtedly a red diaper baby raised by people who hate America which has...  err, influenced ... his world view and consequently his reign over America (blessedly short that it was) as President.  The significance of Obama's college records is that they conclusively prove (as if further proof were necessary) that he is a lying opportunist, dating back at least to his college days.

Struck a nerve, did she?

Puh-leese.  If Americans gave a $h!t about what Meryl Streep and her Hollywierd ilk thought about our (Our!) politics, then we'd be preparing to inaugurate President Hillary Clinton in a few days.

After thinking about this a while, I realized that it's similar to the time I wrote "Moochelle" and you challenged me on it.  I thought about that, too, and realized it is because I don't respect her, and it's hard for me to use the real name of someone who, in my opinion, is neither worthy (of a position, say) or respectable (because of their behavior).  I concluded then that I supposed I should consider a person's name sacrosanct, despite my feelings about them.  I could skip titles, though, as I often do with the current person residing in the White House.

On this issue of Obama's birthplace, here is the deal.  I simply do not trust him, or any of his minions, handlers, cohorts, and cadre.  I don't trust him, or them, asechrest, sir.  Really, AT ALL.  And why should I? Look what he has done to our country!  His only memorable quote in office was a lie!

One can pontificate about this and that, that he has done, and how wonderful he is, but the fact is that his tenure has been painfully disastrous for our country.  Fareed Zakaria did a CNN special on Obama's second term, admitting that it was a disaster, but claimed that "America has failed its President.  It was not ready for his ideas." 

Well, thank God we weren't ready for the compost heap he shoved down our throats and the cloak of despair he threw over our country!  Those who TRUSTED him, and voted for him, brought it all down upon us.  I. Do. Not. Trust. Obama.

I don't trust Trump, either.  My trust has to be earned.  I am watching.

I am not a conspiracy theorist, and don't think I deserve to be called "wildly partisan" and "inconsistent."  I am not a birther.  I didn't care when it was issue, and I don't care about it now.  There were much more important reasons to be concerned about him than where he was born. 

My lack of trust in the whole leftist machine, as we saw exercised in such a WILDLY PARTISAN manner in this election, causes me to trust NOTHING that they do or say.  They have brought it on themselves, and I am not alone amongst thinking, rational people in seeing the horrific tearing away of the mask of civility the leftists managed to hide behind, before they began rioting, blaming everything but themselves, and gnashing their teeth at November 8th's REAL NEWS that there was a large swath of American citizenry who didn't trust them, either.

No, it is not simply a yes or no question. You know the answer to this question, and I know why you are asking. The answer is more convoluted than you think.

YES, CBC members in 2010 introduced a resolution to limit the power of the OCE. It had no support from House Democratic leadership, and at the proposal of the bill, twenty of the forty two members of the CBC supported the resolution. Less than half of the CBC. House Whip Jim Clyburn, a CBC member in 2010, didn't support the measure and neither did Speaker Pelosi. It never made it further than a headline or two for a day and fulfilled a week's worth of programming on conservative media outlets (I'm just spitballing on this one). The resolution died soon after introduced.


Sent from my iPad . Squirrel!!

Mark I appreciate the answer but it is yes or no - that they failed or that it did not have 100% support at the time is irrelevant other than that is the same situation as the recent GOP approach, also not 100% supported, and also not successful.  Simple fact is that the first attempt to gut this office was from the Democrats themselves, 7 years ago.

The real issue is that the Dem's created OCE, in 2008, for the express purpose of weaponizing ethics investigations because it is against the law for HCOE to share details during an investigation - the only problem is, as it always has been, they expected to always be in control of everything but the OCE actually investigated ethics breaches of Dem's as well as Republicans, the CBC felt singled out and pushed for similar limitations as were recently proposed, in 2010.

There is already an office responsible for handling these types of issues (HCOE), and it actually has rules similar to the innocent until proven guilty protections we mere proles enjoy - that was not enough for the Dem's and so they created OCE thinking they could use it against Republican's by making accusations, in public.

'Gimp