So to be clear, you think these women independently all came forward within a one week period, none of them - not a single one - pursued one of the many remedies available to them, and their stories magically sound similar to statements made by a 60-year old guy that came out 10 days ago. 

Sorry, but that doesn't sound like thinking folks.

No.  I think that an army of Clinton goose steppers searched for these women that would be willing to lie long ago.  They probably started searching for them a long time ago when they first found out about the open mic tape, and they held on to both (the tape and the women) until closer to the campaign at a time when they would need a diversion.  The release of the last batch of emails was the situation for which they needed the diversion so that is when they had the women come forward.

That's BS. Preventing religion from creeping into places it doesn't belong is not an infringement of your religious freedom. "Religious freedom" doesn't include the opportunity to wedge it into other people's lives via government.

What is BS is claiming that your right to freedom from religious exposure trumps the rights of everyone else from practicing their religious convictions. It is no different than the little progressive snowflakes claiming that seeing the word TRUMP written ona  whiteboard at a college campus is a hate crime. You folks simply insist that whatever your current popular idiocy is should be mandatory for everyone, or you are being discriminated against, the victim of micro aggression, scared, frightened, and / or the victim of sexism. It's all made up stupidity to make yourselves feel important at others' expense.

Liberal has been redefined over the last generation to the point that it is absolutely indistinguishable from what an actual liberal was in the sixties. An actual liberal would despise the politics of those that think of themselves as liberal to day because the modern liberal is all in on the concept of cradle to grave life manipulation by a small group of thugs who call themselves progressives and are nothing but hard line communists in the Stalin model.
The modern liberal hates freedom to choose except to choose abortion because that is still the holy grail of the communists who call themselves liberal.
The modern liberal claims to hate the 1% who own and control almost everything, but never actually live up to their make believe antipathy because they LOVE 1%'ers as long as they are properly pro abortion and as long as they have TOLD to ignore the abject hypocrisy of everything they say, do and pretend.
The modern liberal rails about the environment but adores the 1%ers who fly in private jets, spewing into the environment the very thing they claim is killing the planet, as long as those people are pro abortion and as long as they have been TOLD to exempt those people from their rants.
The modern liberal hates thinking for themselves, preferring to be TOLD what to think and then they run out demanding everyone else think exactly the same way or be unceasingly attacked for their free thought.
The modern liberal thinks that black ghetto thugs burning American cities over supposed civil rights violations that the majority of the thugs can't accurately describe, but believes that the TEA Party is evil because they think the government should be forced to spend only what they take in. The real truth is that modern liberals HATE us because they've been TOLD to hate us and lack the moral or mental fiber to do otherwise.
The modern liberal thinks their iPhone is wonderful and can't live without it, while attacking the company that makes it for being successful.
The modern liberal hates success in others because it makes them 'feel' less and feelings are so much more important that actions to a modern liberal.
Kristin hates us because that's all she's got.

The vast majority. Liberals already this is all bulshit, made up to project onto Trump the failings that pig, Bill Clinton and Hilary attacked the women he assaulted.
The vast majority of liberals are just fine with it because lying about this and pretending about this damages the enemy and they are fine with zero credibility and even less integrity while praising their Moaist savior.

I am writing in Nixon.

Compared to the lying, criminal oxygen-wasters running for office today, Nixon was a choirboy.  Progress indeed....

^^^^^Then why do you call yourself "militantly moderate" when you are a LIBERAL?  False advertising?

Do liberals care about honesty and integrity?

Given their nominee for president, I'd say the answer is:  clearly no

One can only hope that more and more people will begin to see the Dems' lies and dysfunction and vote farming. Once you realize that you are an enabler of an elite, and the whole elite class you are supposed to despise, the bile must at least begin to rise a little.

Even Sanders has three houses.

How about HRC calling M. Obama her "good friend." Trump was on that one immediately. I wish he had been as fast to point out that her condemnation of violence at his rallies was amusing, since it is liberals who are instigating it.

It was cathartic to hear Trump articulate (!) a good portion of HRC's failings on national television. I have no illusions about HRC losing, but a breach in the media wall has been made this year, and perhaps it will widen.

5 pages of replies, haven't read most of them to be honest with you, but a liberal eggs Trump on in locker room talk and secretly records it, then releases it, about as slimey as you can get.  As far as Trump's words, I saw nothing advocating rape, I do see locker room machismo that most likely is not true, but may be. If it is true, then there are women who feel it is acceptable behavior and per most progressive mantra, who are we to judge?  This is not the way I would tell my son to behave, nor would I want my daughters accepting this as appropriate behavior. At the end of the day this is mild compared to some of the crap I've heard guys use to pick up women.

If you want to hear a story of rape, read Juanita Broaddrick's account.