Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jim Logajan

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 32
61
Spin Zone / Re: Obama Fantasies
« on: August 13, 2023, 04:49:07 PM »
It's just my opinion but I believe Obama has the money, power and connections to act on his fantasies. He's scum.

A lumberjack doesn't need any of that - just dress up in women's clothing and hang around in bars.

62
Spin Zone / Re: 2024 Presidential "Election"
« on: August 10, 2023, 11:23:43 AM »
What DeSantis says is completely irrelevant. That’s just how he’s trying to get elected: He is presenting himself as a conservative.
You don't need to consider what he says - you can research his actions while in office - and during his time in military service.

DeSantis has a voting record and a record of bills he authored or co-authored while in the U.S. House of Representatives.  He also has a record of action as Governor.  One small example that a tiny bit of research would yield: after he left congress he opted to NOT receive his congressional pension and while still in office had filed a measure that would have eliminated congressional pensions.

IMHO any suggestions, hints, or otherwise that DeSantis isn't conservative border on the ludicrous.

63
Spin Zone / Re: Russell Brand censored
« on: August 02, 2023, 04:37:24 PM »
...unalienable Rights, that among these are Life...
Life requires food, water, clothing and shelter so that means government should provide them.
Not my line of reasoning or one I agree with, but I've seen similar.  The meaning of "rights" appears to have been altered by a lot of people to allow that kind of argument to appear valid.

64
Spin Zone / Great place for retirees!
« on: July 28, 2023, 05:46:13 PM »


65
Spin Zone / Re: 2024 Presidential Election
« on: July 21, 2023, 02:53:43 PM »
ALL companies that do this DEI/ESG shit need to be investigated for failing their fiduciary duty. It’s more than culture war when companies put woke garbage above making a profit for their investors when our retirement portfolios and pensions are involved.

I agree they should sell the stock but it’s hard to move on when this crap is spreading like cancer to all corporations.
There was an article on DEI in today's WSJ. Looks like it is being scaled back rather than spreading further:

The Rise and Fall of the Chief Diversity Officer
Diversity executives hit the exits as company priorities shift; ‘everything is a battle’

Two years ago chief diversity officers were some of the hottest hires into executive ranks. Now, they increasingly feel left out in the cold.

Companies including Netflix, Disney and Warner Bros. Discovery have recently said that high-profile diversity, equity and inclusion executives will be leaving their jobs. Thousands of diversity-focused workers have been laid off since last year, and some companies are scaling back racial justice commitments.

Diversity, equity and inclusion—or DEI—jobs were put in the crosshairs after many companies started re-examining their executive ranks during the tech sector’s shake out last fall. Some chief diversity officers say their work is facing additional scrutiny since the Supreme Court struck down affirmative action in college admissions and companies brace for potential legal challenges. DEI work has also become a political target.


66
Spin Zone / Re: Climate Change, the sequel
« on: July 21, 2023, 09:22:03 AM »
"Record-breaking U.S. oil production helps thwart Saudi efforts to drive up prices" - July 8, 2023
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3986338-record-breaking-us-oil-production-helps-thwart-saudi-efforts-to-drive-up-prices

Quote
U.S. crude oil production is on track to set a record this year, up 9% Y/Y through April, helping to keep energy prices stable and blunt the efforts of Saudi Arabia and other oil exporters to drive them higher.

The Energy Information Administration has forecast total U.S. output will hit 12.61M bbl/day in 2023, topping 2019's record of 12.32M bbl/day and easily beating last year's 11.89M bbl/day.
[...]
Companies' efforts to improve efficiency have provided more ability to remain profitable even when oil prices are falling, and improvements since 2014 have cut the cost of drilling and fracking in the U.S. shale by 36%, according to J.P. Morgan.

The increased efficiency means EOG, for example, can earn as much from oil priced at $42/bbl today as it would have from $86/bbl oil in 2014; meanwhile, the budget of Saudi Arabia's government reportedly requires ~$81/bbl oil.

U.S. producers are continuing to seek ways to improve efficiency; Exxon Mobil (XOM) CEO Darren Woods has said the industry still recovers only ~10% of the oil it theoretically could from the Permian Basin.

67
Spin Zone / Re: Climate Change, the sequel
« on: July 18, 2023, 05:36:17 PM »
More C02 in the air simply means more plant growth that turn it back into oxygen.
A study published around 2016 found that more CO2 was greening the planet (other studies have noted that desert areas are shrinking - including the Sahara - projected precipitation changes are adding to the possibility that the Sahara desert may bloom again. The opposite of an apocalyptic result.)
Quote
From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States.

Complete article on the NASA web site:
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth

68
Spin Zone / Re: 2024 Presidential Election
« on: July 16, 2023, 08:47:50 AM »
  Thanks Cliff.    Maybe you should title these "Cliff's notes".   ;)

I try to stay informed by reading things even you post, but you when you post content-free crap you deserve the sarcasm for wasting my and possibly other people's time.

Stop copy-and-pasting long-winded opinionated crap and you'll get no complaints from me. I get to post my opinions here and you'll just have to live with it by posting the same lame insults.

69
Spin Zone / Re: Makes ya proud huh?
« on: July 12, 2023, 07:44:02 PM »
So you're justifying tyranny by making comparisons to what former US presidents have done, while history acknowledges those former presidents abused their power.

The point either went over your head or you refuse to acknowledge it. I wasn't justifying tyranny, I was pointing out you engage in special pleading to rationalize your emotionally derived conclusion.

You and others insist on painting Zelensky as corrupt WITH NO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE.  I myself have previously posted links to articles documenting corruption within the Ukraine government. From what I've read Zelensky attempted and quickly failed to root it out. It is still ongoing and some high level government officials have recently been charged with corruption.

Quote
Final question, which one of your kids or grandkids do you plan on sending in to Ukraine to give his or her life for Zelensky?   Or do you expect other Americans to make that sacrifice so you can feel good?
Straw man argument, much? Show me anywhere where Ukraine has asked any foreign government to commit their forces. I'm not going to argue with fantasies you dream up in your head as if they are forgone conclusions. I sense you are going slightly insane. 2% of the military budget and you argue that means U.S. troops are going to on the ground fighting Russia.

70
Spin Zone / Re: Makes ya proud huh?
« on: July 11, 2023, 03:18:36 PM »
At what cost? 

Russia has lost 50,000 soldiers in the 500+ days of this war.  We lost 58,000 soldiers during the entire Vietnam war.

And we were pissed we were in a proxy war with Russia during Vietnam. I can see us creating quite an enemy with a nuclear power over a corrupt country like Ukraine. 

How many billions of our tax dollars should go to the Ukrainian money laundering scheme?

"Another Republican supporter of Ukraine aid, Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.), said on “Meet the Press” on Sunday that it’s been money well spent. The aid, which equates to 5 percent of the U.S. military budget, has helped take out half of Russia’s military, he said." Source: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/06/27/lawmakers-russia-rebellion-weapons-ukraine-00103913

As to fears of creating an enemy of Russia - hint: when was NATO created and why?

As to corruption: name your sources and the nature of the corruption. Lucifer never did. How does the corruption you documented compare to, say that which occurs in the U.S. or Russia? A few days ago Zelensky visited Snake Island in the Black Sea which is mostly controlled by Russia. As an allegedly corrupt leader with allegedly vast wealth he seems to live dangerously.

One person who never gets criticized on this forum, indeed is rarely mentioned as existing when the subject of Ukraine comes up is Putin. Why do you suppose that is? Is he just a helpless misunderstood benevolent dictator of which the less said the better? No doubt a pawn of the Military Industrial Complex.

71
Spin Zone / Climate Change, the sequel
« on: July 07, 2023, 07:58:38 PM »
The WSJ made the following editorial yesterday that is dead on relevant to some of the questions raised in the closed thread:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-white-house-tells-the-truth-about-climate-change-global-warming-gdp-temperature-economic-growth-52aaf575?st=qo0bho4bvfhmlbr&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

In case the link fails to work, here is the text (the actual article includes a projected GDP change vs Temperature change graph):

"The White House Tells the Truth About Climate Change
A report reveals that global temperature changes barely affects economic growth.

The journalist Michael Kinsley famously noted that “a gaffe is when a politician tells the truth.” By that standard, the White House committed a doozy in March when it released a paper on climate change’s effect on the U.S. economy. Its findings undermine any claims of an ongoing climate crisis or imminent catastrophe.

The report, produced by the Council of Economic Advisers and the Office of Management and Budget, assesses how the economic consequences of climate change could be integrated into federal budgeting. The report’s first figure—reproduced nearby—shows 12 independent peer-reviewed estimates of how America’s gross domestic product would decline as the global temperature rises.

While the estimates differ, each shows an economic impact of less than a few percentage points for a few degrees of warming. The consensus, apart from two counterbalancing outliers, is that today’s warming of 2.2 degrees Fahrenheit has reduced GDP by less than 0.5%. That is trivial, considering real GDP has grown by more than 800% since 1950. If warming reaches 4.5 degrees—about what the United Nation’s climate panel projects for 2100 under plausible scenarios for future global emissions—the consensus reduction amounts to less than 2%. In other words, if the average annual GDP growth rate is 1.5% for the next 80 years, the economy would grow 232%. A 2% climate-change effect would reduce that growth to 225%. As physicists say, that’s a difference “in the noise.”

Economic modeling combined with climate modeling can only be described as a doubly dismal enterprise, rife with uncertainties and untestable assumptions. The White House report offers caveats appropriate to its projections, including that the impact estimates are uncertain, that the consequences of climate may be uneven across sectors and regions, that GDP isn’t the only measure of climate’s effect, and that some types of impacts are omitted.

But, critically, the report also omits America’s amazing capacity to adapt, if not thrive, under a changing climate. The U.S., excluding Alaska and Hawaii, has warmed about 2 degrees Fahrenheit since 1901. Despite that warming, the nation has flourished: Its population has quadrupled, its average life expectancy soared, to 79 years from 48, and its economic activity per capita multiplied around sevenfold. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projects a comparable warming for early next century, but our nation’s experience should lead us to believe that climate change will be only a minor detriment to national welfare. Even hypothetical tipping points—practically irreversible changes such as disintegration of the Greenland ice sheet—are projected to have only minimal effect on the global economy.

A later section of the White House report reinforces how little future greenhouse-gas emissions are expected to affect the U.S. economy in coming decades. It projects that today’s “debt-to-GDP ratio” will rise to 111.2% at midcentury if the world is on a path to achieve net-zero emissions by 2075, while it would rise to 112.6% under an equally unlikely high-emissions scenario. There is little doubt that many factors other than climate—such as technology and trade—will be far more consequential for the economy and debt over the next 25 years. The 1.4% difference between these two extreme scenarios is, again, in the noise.

The report’s authors should be commended for honestly delivering likely unwelcome messages, even if they didn’t make a show of it. The rest of the Biden administration and its climate-activist allies should moderate their apocalyptic rhetoric and cancel the climate crisis accordingly. Exaggerating the magnitude, urgency and certainty of the climate threat encourages ill-considered policies that could be more disruptive and expensive than any change in the climate itself."


72
Spin Zone / Re: Anthony
« on: July 07, 2023, 06:37:12 PM »
I can move it, remove it, or lock it, if I started the thread.  I never noticed those buttons before!  Maybe because I don’t start a lot of threads.


73
Spin Zone / Re: Climate change
« on: July 07, 2023, 09:16:13 AM »
nope - not everyone.

of course Man has an influence.

I concur. Humans affect climate locally and globally. However, the iPCC's predicted amount of change is not an "existential" threat to humanity or the world. Even if it were, there would be no need for government dictate to solve the problem. When properly explained and gently asked, people are willing to do the  right thing. Witness trash recycling - generally not legally required in most places, yet millions voluntarily got into the habit of doing it. (Nevermind that the backend processing was often a lie.)

Suppose the climate changed naturally in a way that was an "existential" threat to humanity. Technical solutions would be considered for the obvious reason that climate is subject to technical manipulation.

74
He pled guilty to a pair of tax-related misdemeanors. The felony gun charge was subject to a pretrial diversion, whatever that actually means. I think what it means is he won't be charged with a felony weapons count, but what he still has to do to avoid said charge isn't all that clear.

The sad thing is a lot of poor people plead guilty for stuff they didn't do just to avoid the timed money needed to deal with courts.

The most serious tax evasion crimes Hunter allegedly committed occurred when he didn't pay taxes on his considerable Burisma 2014 income and income in 2015. But the DoJ allegedly interfered in the IRS investigation, slowing it down, until the 5 year statute of limitations ran out. So he did get away with fraud. (He used the commonest tax-dodge on the books: claimed the money was a loan, not income.)

75
Spin Zone / Re: Joke Thread: Post 'em if ya got 'em
« on: June 18, 2023, 07:15:19 PM »
I fucked up and hit the wrong tab and thought I deleted it. All my fault. I was trying to quote you Joe. Lol.

The paragraph got trans-posed.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 32