61
Spin Zone / Re: Inconsistent pro-lifers
« on: March 22, 2018, 02:25:46 PM »What I take from you not answering my pointed questions is that you don't want to acknowledge the implicit answers in the questions. I don't believe that you are OK with a subset of society agreeing to kill some of it's members, but you can't figure out how to reconcile that with the belief that we must kill certain people. The answer is simple, we should not be killing anyone.You are over simplifying everything. First, in the modern context of "pro-life", it generally refers to the abortion debate, unless otherwise stipulated up front. I understand what the meaning of "pro-life" is (both the modern context and yours), but context is important.
The nazi party was a subset of German society that agreed it was ok to kill some people. They set up the rules for it, followed their rules and according to their rules, they were doing it the right way and to the right people. Of course we condemn this, but we cannot condemn it for any reason other than killing people is wrong. We do it all the same way, we just have much stricter rules and a lower body count.
Not getting anywhere close to the nazi party is one reason I reject capital punishment.
Acrogimp is spot on with his assessments of pro-life and capital punishment. Children are innocent; they have done absolutely nothing wrong and every unborn child is important, because every life is important. Every life holds value, which is why the death penalty is neither easy to receive nor be carried out. You cite the Declaration of Independence in your posts, which is interesting because the follow-on document was the Constitution, and specifically the Fifth Amendment which describes due process. Clearly the framers considered the value of life when they added that part in there.
If you want us to take into consideration your concept of "pro-life" then you must extend the same courtesy to others.