Welcome to PILOT SPIN!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Melania Trump put it best. If these women really think they have a case, let them take it through the courts and produce the evidence in a court of law.Your Orange Lord has a court date in December already.
Hillary has told us she disagrees with the Heller decision that owning a firearm is an individual right. She also has told us she wants Australian style gun bans, and gun confiscation. How's that working out for the Aussies?He's also said that Pres Obama "speaks for all of us" on gun control. So which Trump are you voting for? Do you have any clue?
Trump has told us he supports the 2A AS IS, and will appoint justices in the Scalia mold.
"How dare you beg for my money after the repeated failures to actually stand up and fight for real Conservative values and after all bit abandoning our candidate for President.That's kind of inconsistent of you.
With Hillary it is a guarantee that she will nullify the 2A. She wants to turn us into Australia with draconian gun bans and gun confiscation. With Trump it is an outside chance at best.Ok, the VP candidate for one ticket saying something ambiguous about one gun is a deal breaker for you, but you're voting for a ticket that has the top of the ticket explicitly endorsing the Obama gun agenda. Like I said, cognitive dissonance.
No, he wasn't. Like I said what kind of crappy president would only speak for part of the people?Well, Donnie-boy thought the President did speak for him when he called for banning scary guns.
You disagree? The president was only speaking for a part of the country? Wow, what a crappy thing for a president to do!Was the President speaking for you when he called for banning scary looking guns?
Yep, deal breaker for me also. Plus, I think Johnson is half a loon.But you're cool with voting for someone at the top of the ticket saying that "Obama speaks for all of us" after his call to ban "assault weapons" after Sandy Hook. Interesting...that's pretty severe cognitive dissonance you have running around in your head there.
Honestly, why does anyone waste their time with an asshat like Jeff? He simply wants someone, ANYONE he can find on the Internet to bully around.Wow...are you seriously reading a definition of "projection
It's the caged chimpanzee hurling his shit at everyone.
Voting for a non-criminal. Not a fraudulent conartist (Trump) or someone guilty of mishandling classified info (Clinton)
Stop with the fucking word games. What are YOU doing to prevent a criminal from becoming POTUS?
Ok, now you are pissing me off.Perhaps you should consider that someone pointing out the logical consequences of your position pisses you off, says something of what that means about your position, instead of the person holding the mirror.
GHW Bush, Dole, GW Bush, McCain, Romney. All lesser of two evils, and all RINO's. So yes, I voted for evil. Sue me.Whatever it takes to sleep at night. Just remember, you're voting for a fundamentally evil man, and no amount of running Clinton down as evil makes Trump any less evil.
What's with the "but Hillary!" data dump?Somehow Trumpkins think that making Hillary look bad somehow makes their guy less horrible.
Again, where is the outrage?Hillary Clinton is a despicable human being. Don't vote for her.
