When a larger country invades a smaller one that everyone on both sides knows is going to be won by the big guy, the head of the little country has traditionally fled, particularly if they are corrupt.
As to jailing or shutting down critics or opposition parties or potentially dangerous minorities, something similar was done in the U.S. by government leaders in both WWI and WWII.
Zelensky's corruption is only marginal when compared to a lot of world leaders. All in my humble opinion of course.
Him not fleeing is what makes him attractive. Him jailing critics pissed me off. I understood he is considered corrupt but not to the extent of his predecessors. However, I really have no idea. I was in a game today that has international players and there’s a lot of interesting perspective in chat if you can stand the vulgarities and insults. Anyhoo somebody was talking about how Zelensky was put into power by an Oligarch (kept misspelling that, I don’t think English was their first language. They may have even been Ukrainian) and how corrupt he is. But my issue isn’t that so much as we simply can’t afford to fund their war. He could be a saint, it doesn’t matter. We can’t keep sending him money or spending money arming him. That plus the extreme domestic spending bill (the INFLATION bill), plus killing our energy sector plus lockdown damage, it’s killing us, we can’t do it.
I’ve listened to the other side, the side that thinks we need to continue doing everything we can to help Ukraine fight Russia and they talk about if Russia wins then that empowers China and so on, but they fail to mention the situation we are facing here at home and how funding Ukraine is only worsening that. We are decaying from within and pretty deep already in a cold civil war. That’s not a good position from which to start getting involved in world wars.