Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - President-Elect Bob Noel

Pages: 1 ... 56 57 [58] 59
856
Spin Zone / Re: Presidential Election Results
« on: November 09, 2016, 10:20:33 AM »
I was sooo hoping Trump would open his speech with ""Hillary, you're fired!"

Well, that may have been fun, but wouldn't be gracious, nor Presidential.  Trump can not be the old Trump anymore in that regard. 

857
Spin Zone / Re: Your 2016 Presidential Vote:
« on: November 09, 2016, 07:52:16 AM »
I think that, at this point, I'd prefer we take the "let's work with everyone" approach and not the "we won, suck it" kind of approach.  Obama did that and I think we can be a lot better than Obama.

858
Spin Zone / From the moon
« on: November 08, 2016, 08:14:15 AM »

859
Spin Zone / Re: The new religious freedom
« on: October 20, 2016, 08:12:40 AM »
So I was not politically correct enough?  Maybe demands to salve feelings with politically correct speech is not only for liberal college campuses.  Hmmm . . . .
Not PC enough? You know this board better than that. Not comprehensive enough in scope and perspective. No feelings involved.

860
Spin Zone / Forecasts are catching up with reality
« on: September 29, 2016, 02:31:40 PM »

862
Spin Zone / Re: Let's just get this out onto the table
« on: September 18, 2016, 11:21:24 AM »
My point was that racism is being imputed for political gain upon those who are not racist (Islamaphobe, homophobe, on and on as per HRC's revealing yet typical quote). Such accusations are merely vote farming, as are many practices of the left.

It is a leftist strategy to pick out the most dysfunctional if not literally just AWFUL person they can find who holds an ideology the left wants to attack, be it religion, political party, gender, anything, and then hold that person or tiny group up as an example of the MAJORITY of that group. 

In the same convoluted way, as PaulS said in another post, they lift up and even reward those who make dysfunctional decisions.  I have also noted that the left tries to skew laws toward the few, bringing havoc and dysfunction upon the many!  In the name of compassion!  On and on we could go.  The left has created and is still creating a parasitic society that the producers ultimately cannot bear. 

All this and more is what I am tired of, and that is what I will not be silent about.

Here is Dr. Ben Carson's response to HRC:

“In a very telling moment, Hillary Clinton maligned me and millions of other Americans as racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic and Islamophobic ‘deplorables."

“I’m so tired of this line of attack that normally taunts conservatives. Well, let me be very specific in my response. I believe in expanding opportunity, not welfare; that’s not racist."

“I believe every life is worth protecting, particularly the unborn; that doesn’t make me sexist."

“I believe marriage is between one man and one woman; that’s not homophobic."

“I believe in borders, the rule of law and our sovereign right to decide who to let into our country; that’s not xenophobic."

“I believe radical Islam is a mortal threat to America and Western civilization; that is common sense, not Islamophobia.”

You say my link is a rant against Obama.  It is not.  But he must take some responsibility for worsening race relations on his watch, promising much in that regard and delivering little.  Remember "all states should be purple?"  The vote farming continues.  "Are you Latino/Hispanic or non-Latino/Hispanic" is now firmly on medical forms, and my doctor says it does one thing only:  Gives more benefits to those who say that are Latino/Hispanic.  I declined to check those boxes and told the receptionist I thought we were supposed to have a colorblind society?  I can see "race," because it can affect medical decisions.  But not blatant vote farming. "Latino/Hispanic" is not a race.

Finally, from my link:

"And speaking of foreign lands, I've spent time abroad and speak Spanish and French and if Mr. Obama thinks the U.S. is a racist country, he ought to do a little bit of traveling not on Air Force One.  Try sitting at a French dinner table for twenty minutes and listening to the casual conversation if you think America is racist.

The truth is the USA is remarkably un-racist for a country its size.  We weren't always that way, obviously, but we walked the walk and we are now.  Or were.  The Democrat Party and its assorted media hacks are trying to take us backwards.  They suffer from nostalgia for racism for the glorious days when they could assert their moral superiority.  Sorry, those days are over.  The only way to stop remaining racism is to stop it, not talk about it, impute racism to people who don't have it and generally do everything possible to divide the American people from themselves.

And, Democrats, above all if you care about black people, stop it.  All you're doing is making their lives worse."


863
Spin Zone / Re: The PilotSpin Joke Thread
« on: September 08, 2016, 06:51:46 AM »

864
Spin Zone / Road Sign
« on: August 16, 2016, 10:43:54 AM »
In South Carolina



865
Spin Zone / Re: "This is how freedom dies"
« on: August 07, 2016, 10:40:18 AM »
Found this......


866
Spin Zone / Re: Actually Comey said I was truthful about the emails
« on: August 01, 2016, 01:07:41 PM »

867
Distillation was developed into its modern form with the invention of the alembic by Islamic alchemist Jabir ibn Hayyan in around 800 C.E.  Thats why its called al-chohal.  Coffee was originally gowns and brewed in the mountains of Yemen. It was shipped all over the world out of the port of Mocha.

Nonsense, it was a Russian inwention.


868
Spin Zone / Re: Another Clinton Scandal off the table
« on: June 29, 2016, 11:17:55 AM »

869
Spin Zone / Re: Trump Issues
« on: June 07, 2016, 03:21:58 PM »
I simply reject your premise out of hand. You assign consequences to those for whom no culpability should be assigned. Truly, your logic is like a pretzel: A voter who believes on principle that a set of candidates is unfit for office and in doing so decides to abstain or vote for someone else, is suddenly in your eyes "at fault" if the candidate who opposes the one you support wins the presidency; despite the fact that said voter has literally given no support to the winner. Does not follow. It is the very definition of a principle to remain steadfast when others throw their principles out in favor of "results"; a hallmark of Trump as we have learned, and apparently perhaps a feature within his group of supporters. (And let's be clear that said feature is not partisan.)

In a race between two untenable candidates I choose neither. I refuse to be "at fault" for the shitty candidate that gets the seat, because whether I vote for either or I don't (on principle, not due to apathy), we still get a shitty candidate. Whether you subjectively believe one shitty candidate to be less shitty than the other is your subjective right, but not my obligation to accept.

(Edit - fixed wording)
I think this is what you are looking for:


870
Spin Zone / Talk about a Bench-Slap
« on: May 20, 2016, 06:36:31 AM »
For those not familiar with the term...a bench slap is when a judge goes off on lawyers in their court in a particularly eloquent way.


The case in question is the DACA injunction lawsuit in Texas, where Texas and 25 other states have sued the Feds to stop the implementation of Obama's executive amnesty



http://hotair.com/archives/2016/05/20/federal-judge-lowers-the-boom-on-doj-after-bad-faith-misrepresentations/


Quote
This Court has found no authority to support the concept that it is ever ethical and appropriate conduct to mislead a court and opposing counsel; nor has the Government provided any authority to that effect. That being the case, the Court finds no need for a comprehensive dissertation on the duty of candor and honesty because counsel in this case failed miserably at both. The Government’s lawyers in this case clearly violated their ethical duties.
...
The misconduct in this case was intentional, serious and material. In fact, it is hard to imagine a more serious, more calculated plan of unethical conduct. There were over 100,000 instances of conduct contrary to counsel’s representations; such a sizable omission cannot be classified as immaterial.
...
Therefore, this Court, in an effort to ensure that all Justice Department attorneys who appear in the courts of the Plaintiff States that have been harmed by this misconduct are aware of and comply with their ethical duties, hereby orders that any attorney employed at the Justice Department in Washington, D.C. who appears, or seeks to appear, in a court (state or federal) in any of the 26 Plaintiff States annually attend a legal ethics course.

Pages: 1 ... 56 57 [58] 59