It is a Democrat War on Women!

Allegedly it has this alternate meaning
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympic_Project_for_Human_Rights

Were the cadets protesting unequal hiring and participation in the Olympics by African Americans?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raised_fist 

They were giving a sign of solidarity against the "system".  Sad that some may start their active careers with a mark on their record.

The US competing in a borderless world is just another way for Democrats to hold onto power by forcing the middle class to compete with cheaper foreign workers and become poorer in the process.  The United States is a bubble in relative terms of the world economy.  This does not end well for American workers.

We know what happens when bubble pop.  In this case, it will mean that many people who have been upwardly mobile will suddenly begin competing against people who do everything for less.  I work in consulting today and we see this with firms like Infosys and Cognizant, two companies that get the majority of H-1B visas.  These guys undercut our prices to the point they are asking for an hourly rate less than our cost for college graduates.  Now never mind that they deliver bad service, that doesn't come around until later and a company can keep doing that for 10-20 years before the market catches on.  Never mind that H-1B laws state they must pay a competitive market rate to their employees, that would ruin their operating model.

Extend this out to everyone.  An Indian guy will take your job on the assembly line and do it for less.  Or if you're "lucky", he'll take your buddy's job and you'll take a pay cut to stay employed.  That is the economic result of a borderless world when you are an economic bubble.  In the US it will mean a massive jump in poverty families and a lowering average wage.  Once indexed for inflation, you should expect to see it decline even more and for that decline to encompass more and more people.

Just remember that it's Democrats that are pushing this on you.

Not sure where the Dunham youtube post is, but he pointed out - Cruz called Trump a  "pathological liar," "utterly amoral," "a narcissist at a level I don't think this country's ever seen" and "a serial philanderer."

These are exactly the things that make him qualified to be a politician.

why would it?

UCMJ Article 88, Contempt toward Officials
DoD Directive 1344.10

Service members may and perhaps are encouraged to have an opinion but they are prohibited from implying in any way that their military branch supports their idea, whether it's done while wearing a uniform or just a statement like "I'm a US Solider and I think..."

Think about something - if an American general were elected president, would that be an election or a military coup?

I think Kasich was only hanging in to try to play Kingmaker at the convention.  With Cruz dropping out there's no value in that anymore so he has nothing to hope for. 

Those that are in danger of losing their congressional or senate seat deserve to lose because they are incompetent or inept.  If they can't retain office on their own merits why should they depend on a presidential nominee to do it for them?

That's a nice fantasy but the reality is that a de-energized electorate does not go to the polls.  Very few people are excited about voting for Donald.  Slightly more are excited about voting for Hillary.  That's her and the Democrat's edge.

I will be voting because I view it as a duty.  But I can only say that I will not vote for Donald.  I don't think I'll vote for Hillary anyway.

Remember - the key phrase is "Madame President" and you did it by making Donald the candidate.  Congratulations. 

Obviously the officer made a mistake.  But I don't think an officer's mistake necessarily rises to a civil rights violation.  You retrain the officer, use the incident to point out to everyone else how the mistake was made and why it was wrong and prevent it from happening in the future.  If I had to sacrifice 2 hours of my life to prevent this from happening in the future, then for the good of the community I'm ok with that.  But only if I know the training is going to be done.

If the police cannot act responsibly as I described above then I say fry them.  That would appear to be the only language they're going to pay attention to.