They should not have been allowed to object to the electors?
What about all the members of the Black Caucus that object to Trump electors? I guess that was okay?

I am not in favor of any objecting to electors when there is no evidence of fraud or other shenanigans.  However, the contexts were quite different.  Clinton wasn't claiming, falsely, that the election was stolen or that there was fraud.  Cruz, Hawley, and all the rest knew that there was no supportable challenge but they did it like any other craven politician for their own political profit.

Aren’t you lucky that stupidity isn’t painful?

I will take your word for it, as you clearly would know.

While I don’t doubt some here don’t like it when you challenge them, I don’t believe anyone here is actively trying to get you to leave.  If you do leave, that is entirely on you.

Regardless, this is nothing compared to the New McCarthyism that Democrats are endorsing. Their bias has risen to the level of discrimination. It is wrong, it is unAmerican, it is immoral.

Can you explain what you see as the Dems New McCarthyism?  I am not seeing anything outside basic politics as practiced by both parties.

Oh please.  Nice try playing the victim.

So 7's attempts to get everyone to ignore me is not cancellation?  How interesting.

Conservatives are getting fired, posts deleted, statements silenced, book contracts terminated, networks threatened, advertisers threatened, radio stations threatened for having a conservative talk radio host, speaking engagements canceled, doxed, threatened in public, means of communications cut off, businesses and livelihoods threatened from both public threats and governmental threats including fines, loss of business licenses, etc.  For decades the left wore “Coexist” bumper stickers. Now we see they never ever meant it.

Let’s all play adult now. There’s nothing funny about the assault on freedom and liberty.

Do you have any specific examples of conservatives being fired, silenced, book deals cancelled for merely being conservative, separate from some fascist type behavior like trying to overturn the election and ransacking the capital?

No, I’m calling out what is abhorrent behavior.

Your opinion, and given your history of posting, it is clear that you are very selective in what you consider abhorrent.

Both parties are culpable for the amount of illegal immigrants coming to the US. Democrats want new voters, republicans want low wage workers. Both reasons are evil.

For various reasons, both parties are culpable.  There is no real evidence that the Dems are in it for the votes.  They, like the GOP's, are taking money from the entities that profit from the illegals.

Do you support building the wall as was planned?

Replacing the existing fences with something better, makes some sense, but I am not sure it is the most cost effective.  Again, if we make it impossible for illegals to make money, then they will quit coming and a wall will not be needed.  If we keep incentivizing illegals to come because they can make money, then no wall will prevent the migration.

What ACTIONS did Trump take or policies he put in place that would define him as a Sociopath?  What actions did he take that were criminal?  Did he illegally bypass Congress and the courts?

Policy doesn't make someone a sociopath.  Trump is a sociopath because he is one.  The fact that he has no male friends, the fact that he stiffs contractors, the fact that he eventually throws all of his supporters under the bus as soon as they are no longer useful to him.  All that that makes him a sociopath.  Throwing Guiliani under the bus is his latest demonstration of his sociopathic tendencies.

He is an unconvicted criminal at this point, but as Paul Harvey used to say, stand by for news.  Rape, obstruction of justice, inciting violence, conspiracy, etc.  Trump has a historically corrupt administration.