You are not canceled.  You are free to post as much as you wish.  There may be vigorous opposition to what you say, but you are not canceled.  If that were the case, the illustrious moderators of this site would ban you and erase all threads that you participated in.  Like PoA does.  That is not the case here.  But is very much the case where democrats ban all speech they disagree with.  Or think they might disagree with in the future.

Sure.  Just call it a "preemptive impeachment".  Why ban Trump from office?  For something he might do in the future?  Just drum up a charge against anyone who is running for office, say that they might do something bad someday, do the impeachment and ban them from office.  Easy.

It follows the democrats' playbook.  Don't like something, get it banned.  Don't like the conversation, shut it down.  Don't like someone, get them banned from even running from office.  What is to stop the democrat house and senate from passing a law that bans someone from office?  Really... It looks like X is running.  Let's pass a law that prevents X from fundraising, from rallies (for the sake of democracy!), from holding office (for the sake of the children!).  Let's get the banks to withhold loans or services from anyone who might cause trouble in the future (like they are doing now).  Let's get the media platforms to ban anyone who might cause trouble in the future (like they are doing now).

This "this person might say something bad someday" banning is very very bad.

Ok, who are you and what did you do with Kristin?

I think the "Path to citizenship" should be a tough one.  However, I do have sympathy for kids that were brought over by their parents and have played by the rules since then.

But if we go down that road, we need IMMEDIATELY make it clear that that path does not apply to anyone that enters from here on out.  Anyone that enters illegally going forward needs to be deported (or worse) asap.  Otherwise we will see a virtual invasion.

I don't know how we could actually close the borders.  Perhaps armed drones, but I doubt that would go over well.

Ideally, we would have a desk in those countries that would accept and process applications to enter the US.  Those people would remain in their country until they are approved.  I'm aware that a system like that exists, but it needs to be put on steroids.  We need to end the stupid lottery and set standards, not quotas, but at the same time we should increase the allowable number of legal migrations while reducing the number of illegal entries to zero.  If you want to come here, first identify yourself, then demonstrate a reason we should accept you.

I could go on with conditions and restrictions, I don't have the time.  I'll just add that I am all for legal immigration and I think there should be much more of it and there should not be so many barriers.  But I have little sympathy for people that enter illegally.

Even if I agreed with that, I have a bigger problem with the fact that they killed so many other blacks and destroyed so many black-owned businesses, in the name of "Black lives matter".

Yes, Black lives do matter.  So why do blacks kill so many other blacks?

Isn't that what elections are for?

I can't see where it explains when Biden's $15/hr minimum wage is expected to be implemented.  Florida has already voted to increase the State minimum wage to $15 over the next 6 years, but I believe it retains the allowance of reduced minimum for service personnel that accrue additional tip income.  It appears Biden's plan is to do away with that exception.  That means tipping will pretty much go away.

False because CNN declared it so?  The courts have almost in universally punted and did not examine the facts. That happened in PA, and it happened in Wisconsin, where Justice Hagedorn said that the Trump campaign should have challenged irregularities before the election, and presumably before they occurred, but because they challenged it after the election, they were too late to overturn the vote, so they elected not to address any claims brought forth.

If the Feds were easier on the "white crazies" it was only because they were taken by surprise.  Nobody expects white people to riot.

But they sure are going after them after the fact much harder than they did for the summer rioters. And the preparation against the "white crazies" for the inauguration is significantly larger than any for the summer rioters and looters.

But actually, I'm not faulting blacks for the summer rioting.  They probably felt just as, if not more, justified than the capitol rioters.  What I do object to is all the lives they took and all the property they destroyed.  What good did it do to kill all those other black people and destroy all those black owned businesses.  If I were them, I would have gone after "whitey". Not other innocent blacks.

That's what I think.