Nancy will ultimately suffer defeat over this. 

The dims are starting to question giving her the Speaker's gavel. 

BTW, notice Chuck is being somewhat quiet today.

Nancy is so frightened of the new Socialist activist members of her party that she’s doing everything in her power to out-Wacko them, which ain’t easy with Ocasio Cortez.

^^^^Good idea.  Here are soime Democrat positions.


Man Made Climate Change - The Dems are for a "carbon tax", and a cap and trade program run by government.

Illegal Aliens/Border Security - The Dems are for Amnesty for illegals, which to me is the same a Open Borders.

Repeal Trump Tax cuts - This one baffles me.  They want to effectively raise rates even though we are seeing record Fed tax revenue.

Further restrict the extraction of domestic fossil fuels - Dems don't like drilling, fracking and they hate coal even if it is just for export.

"Free" college - yeah good luck with that.

"Free Health Care" - Single payer, government run healthcare.  Yeah good luck with that.

More gun control laws - We already have 22,000 gun laws on the books.  Most are unconstitutional, yet the Dems want more with the eventual ban and confiscation of most of them like the UK, and Australia have.  Criminals don't follow these laws, and if you disarm the law abiding they will be even more emboldened.



Can any of these be defended reasonably, and logically?  Other Dem talking points, strategies, or policies?

Regarding repealing the Trump tax cuts, the Iron Lady Margaret Thatcher knew of this back in 1990:

“All levels of income are better off than they were in 1979. But what the honorable member is saying is that he would rather the poor were poorer provided the rich were less rich. That way you will never create the wealth for better social services as we have. And what a policy. Yes. He would rather have the poor poorer provided the rich were less rich. That is the Liberal (British Socialists) policy. Yes it came out. He didn’t intend it to but it did.”

What, just for THINKING? I’ll get the President to halt their transport. 

You don’t think the democrats consider re-education an essential government function?   Well, that plus killing babies.

You gentlemen will now be escorted to the political re-education camp, being run by Commandant Ocasio-Cortez. That black helicopter now hovering in your front yards is your ride. Enjoy the re-learning!

Super good timing, too ... he waited until they were on the bus heading for the plane.

https://mobile.twitter.com/jason_donner/status/1085996085519224832

It was just ..... perfect. Man I love this guy. People think they can out-Trump Donald Trump. I’m not sure it’s possible.

Can you imagine the laughter in the meeting when it was proposed that Trump ground Pelosi and Schiff? 

This is so rich.

Dems can boycott SOTU. Half of Congress missing would really look good!

Or they can attend and look like pouty baby zombies while Trump unloads on them to all of America.

Then they can respond with canned pablum laced with liberal Kool Aid.

Fill the empty seats on the Democrat side of the aisle with Angel Moms. (Parents of children killed by illegal immigrants.).

Or give the SOTU from the border, with border agents as the audience.

Much of Science seems to have become corrupt, and all about money and funding.  Scientist are now greedy, and biased in many instances.  Ethics have taken a back seat to greed, and personal gain.

THIS is what concerns me most. Last night I took a red eye back home, and driving home from the airport I listened to Coast to Coast AM with some host named George something. He had a physicist with a Ph.D. In nuclear chemistry or geochemistry. I think his name was Marvin Herndon or something. Anyway, the discussion was on geoengineering and I shit you not, chemtrails.  He had all kinds of information on some chemical from coal fly ash which is used to manipulate weather that was found in children, blah blah blah. He spoke about the “deep state perfect storm”, implying that government (military) manipulation of the weather is a direct cause of the CA wildfires, etc. 

So here’s the problem. Just as some pilots are vastly better than other pilots, some PhD scientists are vastly different from other PhD scientists. Throw in government political motivation for a desired outcome, government research grants potentially impacting objectivity, and media into the mix, and you get at best something that we ALL should be skeptical about.

So Steingar ridiculed the scientist that
Is the topic of this thread. I ridicule the lunatic scientist on Coast to Coast. Steingar’s measure for incontestable proof is “peer review”, but punctuated by what he feels or believes.  He used those terms above I believe. Yet are those peer reviewers pure as the wind driven snow, or are they potentially biased as well?  Is Steingar at the top of the genetic scientist heap, or is he at the bottom?  We don’t know, but I’m put on guard when he completely dismisses and ridicules the scientist in this article, or  climate scientists that don’t happen to match his scientific world view on MMCC.