Using "persuasive" as the criteria overlooks the way election results can be changed.  It only takes targeted election fraud.  For example, there is no need for the democrats to commit election fraud in massachusetts.  This state would vote for any idiot with a (D) after his/her name and has done so many many times.

Want to steal an election?  concentrate resources in the small number of swing states, especially portions that you already control.

THIS.  There was no need for widespread fraud.  Only one or two counties in a half dozen states, that’s it.  When you look at the entire context beyond 2000 Mules including the Time.org article with the Democrats audaciously bragging about basically “fixing” the election so the “correct” outcome would happen, beginning in early 2020 when they realized that lockdowns could be used to implement a massive change in voting procedures, you look at the forensic evidence of the Dominion machines, you look at how the vote counts were halted at the same time in multiple districts in multiple states, and look at the vote total change along the time axis just as it was becoming clear Trump was ahead, changes that just pushed Biden over the top, and you see cases such as total votes exceeding a district’s entire population, look at the bellwether counties that all went for Trump, all this is undisputed fact, and then look at Trump’s rally turnout vs Biden’s pathetic campaign, put all that together it is statistically impossible for Biden to have won. 

Well kudos for their bravery in the face of terrorist threats from the left but where the hell was that courage in 2020 when all we wanted was an investigation into election fraud? 

"The National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) will be undergoing a system-wide upgrade starting June 6, 2022. NVSS COVID-19 surveillance webpages and data files will be paused until system updates are complete. Data updates are expected to resume on or before June 27, 2022. "

Well, they managed to not do the "upgrade" on schedule...  Now finishing a week later...

Any bets on additional delays?

The data doesn't support their masters' policies.  The data must be changed.

It’s not paranoia, Jim.

The tests are unreliable. This is well known, but not taken into account in any “official” figures that I’ve seen. Oddly, officials have admitted the tests are unreliable, but they keep churning out figures based on them.

No risk/benefit analysis taking vaccine injury into account is shown in any “official” figures I’ve seen. All we are told is that VAERS is self reporting and therefore unreliable. And that the vaccines are SAFE AND EFFECTIVE.

Where are the robust studies recording and cataloging and analyzing vaccine injuries? As I recall you were injured by your vax, with tinnitus. What I AM seeing is frustrated health care workers reporting that they can’t break through the glassy stare from doctors and administrators when the injuries are reported.

Have you been looking into the case numbers of myocarditis, stroke, sudden death, cancer … as they compare to normal? I have two personal stories of vax injuries and cannot pretend they were normal or caused by anything else.

Why are mask and vaccine mandates disappearing? Businesses in my town that once required proof of vaccination no longer do. Yet, “official” numbers seem to indicate a deadly virus is afoot.

People who say “This doesn’t add up” are demonized. You could find perfect weather on all aviation local weather reporting, but still look at the sky on flight day and say “no go.”  Numbers and statistics have a purpose but they are not a workable refuge from reality.

Yep.....

I recommend a heart well done and a prodigious participation trophy celebrating such devotedvirtue signaling.

That’s the bitch who outed the owner of the Libs on Tick Tock site.

Well, it wasn't the smartest thing to do, and they should have removed her.  My gripe is that if she was doing that to Trump, nothing would have happened.

Of the 2000 people identified, how many of those were found near the ballot drop boxes AND were dropping off ballots on video. Particularly, how many did so more than once?
The actual data in terms of answers to these questions were not clear to me in either article frankly.

To be defined as a mule they set the threshold at 10 or more visits to drop boxes by any single cell phone. They set the bar high so as to address the sort of concern you raise. Surveillance video simply wasn't taken at many drop boxes or they couldn't get access to view, but they allegedly have 4 million minutes of video and haven't been through it all.

In any case, the tracking appears to have been sufficiently detailed enough that the mules have been back-tracked to the non-profits that supplied the ballots as well as the likely residences of the mules. The tracking data is already being used to investigate alleged mules in Arizona.

Dinesh D’Souza does address your particular question, and goes into detail on other aapects, in this video posted just today:

And as noted in both articles, none of this is particularly compelling evidence that this would have affected the outcome of the election.

My own view on that of course is that all human processes have a finite error rate. Very few are 1 part in 200 million, so that means there will always be some error in vote counting in the US. Basically the outcome was within random error.

The five states they examined had very small winning margins between Biden and Trump. Voting is supposed to be a deterministic process so the error rates should be much lower than the margin of victory in those states. The whole point of ballot stuffing is to exceed the margin of error so your candidate wins.

P.S. I have not seen 2000 Mules yet either. All the info I have is from the attached Youtube video and other sources that reviewed the film.