Welcome to PILOT SPIN!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Jury’s our as to whether AG Sessions will have the balls to do that.
We all know they shouldn't be here, and broke a law or civil rule to get here. Saying that over and over again does nothing for us. A lot of things shouldn't happen, but they do, and we have to figure out what to do about it.
Wow.
Why didn't I read about this in the MSM?
Justice Department official Bruce Ohr did not disclose Fusion GPS was paying his wife
Ohr was demoted from his post after the information emerged
Willfully falsifying government ethics documents can result in jail time
Bruce Ohr, the Department of Justice official who brought opposition research on President Donald Trump to the FBI, did not disclose that Fusion GPS, which performed that research at the Democratic National Committee’s behest, was paying his wife, and did not obtain a conflict of interest waiver from his superiors at the Justice Department, documents obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation show.
The omission may explain why Ohr was demoted from his post as associate deputy attorney general after the relationship between Fusion GPS and his wife emerged and Fusion founder Glenn Simpson acknowledged meeting with Ohr. Willfully falsifying government ethics forms can carry a penalty of jail time, if convicted.
The Democratic National Committee (DNC) hired Fusion GPS to gather and disseminate damning info about Trump, and they in turn paid Nellie Ohr, a former CIA employee with expertise in Russia, for an unknown role related to the “dossier.” Bruce Ohr then brought the information to the FBI, kicking off a probe and a media firestorm.
In a Tedx Talk at the University of Nevada a couple of weeks ago, investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson revealed the origins of the "fake news" narrative that was aggressively pushed by the liberal media and Democrat politicians during the 2016 election, and how it was later flipped by President Donald Trump.
Attkisson pointed out that "fake news" in the form of tabloid journalism and false media narratives has always been around under different names.
But she noticed in 2016, there seemed to be a concerted effort by the MSM to focus America's attention on the idea of "fake news" in conservative media. That looked like a propaganda effort to Attkisson, so she did a little digging and traced the new spin to a little non-profit called "First Draft," which, she said, "appears to be the about the first to use 'fake news' in its modern context."
"On September 13, 2016, First Draft announced a partnership to tackle malicious hoaxes and fake news reports," Attkisson explained. "The goal was supposedly to separate wheat from chaff, to prevent unproven conspiracy talk from figuring prominently in internet searches. To relegate today's version of the alien baby stories to a special internet oblivion."
We'll get what we got in the 80's. The Dems will say. "let them stay and give them amnesty and we promise to build the wall". The Repubs will, "What a great deal, we'll take it" The wall will never get built and 20 years from now we'll right back in the same place.
You are funny.
But you are the one who quit talking. I will and have given reasons for what I say.
What I see from is a lot of poeple sticking your fingers in you ears and chanting "they broke the law and I cant hear you la-la-la".
Read my post just above here...it isn't organized well because I am typing on my Ipad and. Editing is difficult at best. But see if you can understand the theme. If not, ask and I will reorganize it when I am at a computer.
You of all people should recognize the dangers in irritating others.
White House problems with the Democrats’ “rebuttal memo” on the surveillance of Trump associates are genuine and the document could disclose “sources and methods,” California Rep. Adam Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence confirmed.
“We need to go through that and identify that which remains classified and would implicate sources and methods or investigative interests,” he said at a newsmaker’s breakfast meeting on Wednesday sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor.
His comments constituted a direct rebuke to his party’s top boss in the House of Representatives, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.
You don't want to defend what you say. Gotcha. I find you annoying anyway, probably best this way.
If the problem is that you're getting hung up on the law, how about if the President pardons all of them after the law is passed. However you want to do it, a single pardon with 690,000 names on it or 690,000 individual pardons. Now the Dreamers are excused from the law and the fact that they broke it is recognized and legally handled. This is a legal path, 100% of the actions are authorized by US Law.
Or do you reject this and you aren't really about defending the Law?
Re-read your post. Looks the same as before. No time for a back-and-forth on reading comprehension, so I'll just concede your point, whatever it was.
Not entirely correct. There are federal laws regarding illegal entry, but not visa overstays, which are a civil infraction and constitute two thirds of the current flow.
That's a lame retort. There are federal laws on the books that covers people who illegally enter the country. And the federal code cites penalties for the infractions of the laws.
Well if we're going to ignore that there are varying levels of infractions and varying levels of consequences, why don't we just start executing people for speeding?
